A comparison of the standard and the computerized versions of the Well- being Questionnaire (WBQ) and the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ)

被引:1
作者
Pouwer F. [1 ,4 ]
Snoek F.J. [1 ]
Van Der Ploeg H.M. [1 ]
Heine R.J. [2 ]
Brand A.N. [3 ]
机构
[1] Department of Medical Psychology, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
[2] Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
[3] Dept. of Clin. and Health Psychology, University of Utrecht
[4] Department of Medical Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, Vrije Universiteit, 1081 BT, Amsterdam
关键词
Computer-assisted assessment; Diabetes mellitus; Equivalence; Satisfaction with treatment; Well-; being;
D O I
10.1023/A:1008832821181
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In the present study, the equivalence of paper and pencil assessment versus computer assessment of two self-administered questionnaires was investigated by means of a randomized cross-over design. Therefore, 105 out- patients with diabetes were invited to participate; 76 patients completed both the computer and the paper and pencil version of the Well-being Questionnaire (WBQ) and the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) in a randomized order, with a mean interval of 7 days. The scales showed high test-retest correlations and the means, dispersions, kurtosis and skewness were found to be approximately the same in both versions. In both modes of assessment, the depression and the energy scale proved to be sensitive for carry-over effects, resulting in better well-being scores at the second measurement. Almost all subjects reported that using the personal computer in the realization of a questionnaire was easy. It is concluded that the paper and pencil and the computerized versions of the WBQ and DTSQ can be considered equivalent. Therefore, the norms and cut-off scores obtained from paper and pencil assessments can be used in computerized versions of the WBQ and DTSQ and vice versa.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 38
页数:5
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
Bradley C., Lewis K.S., Measures of psychological well-being and treatment satisfaction developed from the responses of people with tablet-treated diabetes, Diabetic Med, 7, pp. 445-451, (1990)
[2]  
Bradley C., Handbook of Psychology and Diabetes: A Guide to Psychological Measurement in Diabetes Research and Practice, (1994)
[3]  
Krans H.M.J., Porta M., Keen H., Diabetes Care and Research in Europe: The St Vincent Declaration Action Programme Implementation Document, (1992)
[4]  
Guidelines for Computer Based Tests and Interpretation, (1986)
[5]  
Wredling R., Stalhammer J., Adamson U., Berne C., Larsson Y., Ostman J., Well-being and treatment satisfaction in adults with diabetes: A Swedish population-based study, Qual Life Res, 4, pp. 515-522, (1995)
[6]  
Bech P., Gudex C., Staehr Johansen K., The WHO (Ten) Well-being Index: Validation in diabetes, Psychother Psychosom, 65, pp. 183-190, (1996)
[7]  
Brand N., Houx P.J., MINDS: Toward a computerized test battery for health psychological and neuropsychological assessment, Behav Res Methods, Instrument and Comput, 24, pp. 385-389, (1992)
[8]  
Kline P., The Handbook of Psychological Testing, (1993)
[9]  
White D.M., Clements C.B., Fowler R.D., A comparison of computer administration with standard administration of the MMPI, Comput Hum Behav, 1, pp. 153-162, (1985)
[10]  
Honaker L.M., Harrell T.H., Buffaloe J.D., Equivalency of microtest computer MMPI administration for standard and special scales, Comput Hum Behav, 4, pp. 323-337, (1988)