Becoming the best: By beating or ignoring the best? Toward an expanded view of the role of managerial selection in complex and turbulent environments

被引:6
作者
Moran P. [1 ]
Simoni M. [2 ]
Vagnani G. [3 ]
机构
[1] School of Strategy and Entrepreneurship, Australian School of Business, University of New South Wales, Sydney
[2] Department of Business Studies, Parthenope, University of Naples, Naples 80133
[3] Department of Management and Technologies, Sapienza, University of Rome, Rome 00161
关键词
Competitive focus; Managerial selection; Market selection; NKC model;
D O I
10.1007/s10997-010-9129-2
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper explores how the rules that guide search affect organizational adaptation in complex and turbulent environments. Our consideration of such rules extends beyond search scope-i.e., exploitation of current technologies vs. exploration of new technologies-to include focus on competition. We consider two types of competitive focus-i.e., external, where the choice of focal technology to be improved is influenced by information about other organizations and internal, where it is not influenced by others. We refer to this expanded set of rules as managerial selection and vary it to explore how it affects organizational adaptation. Employing an agent based simulation model, built on the framework of NKC fitness landscapes, we consider multiple types of interdependencies within and between technologies and across competitors. We show that in the presence of these multiple interdependencies, the ability of organizations to adapt is conditioned as much or more by the focus of search than by its scope. In particular, we observe that in simple and stable environments, organizational adaptation is enhanced by an external focus but in complex and turbulent environments, such external focus is counterproductive. © 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
引用
收藏
页码:447 / 481
页数:34
相关论文
共 64 条
  • [1] Alchian A., Uncertainty, evolution and economic theory, Journal of Political Economy, 58, pp. 211-221, (1950)
  • [2] Benner M.J., Tushman M.L., Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited, Academy of Management Review, 28, pp. 238-256, (2003)
  • [3] Bickhard M.H., Campbell D.T., Variations in variation and selection: The ubiquity of the variation-and-selective-retention ratchet in emergent organizational complexity, Foundations of Science, 8, pp. 215-282, (2003)
  • [4] Burgelman R.A., Intra-organizational ecology of strategy-making and organizational adaptation: Theory and field research, Organization Science, 2, pp. 239-262, (1991)
  • [5] Burgelman R.A., Fading memories: A process theory of strategic business exit in dynamic environments, Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, pp. 24-56, (1994)
  • [6] Conway R.W., Johnson B.M., Maxwell W.L., Some problems of digital systems simulation, Management Science, 6, pp. 92-110, (1959)
  • [7] Davis J.P., Eisenhardt M.K., Bingham C.B., Developing theory through simulation methods, Academy of Management Journal, 32, pp. 480-499, (2007)
  • [8] Drazin R., van de Ven A.H., Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory, Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, pp. 514-539, (1985)
  • [9] Ethiraj S.K., Levinthal D., Modularity and innovation in complex systems, Management Science, 50, pp. 159-173, (2004)
  • [10] Friedman M., The Methodology of Positive Economics. Essays in Positive Economics, (1953)