Towards models of strategic spatial choice behaviour: Theory and application issues

被引：4

作者：

Han Q. ^{[1
]}

Timmermans H. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Urban Planning Group, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven 5600 MB

来源：

GeoJournal | 2006年 / 67卷 / 3期

关键词：

Learning; One-shot; Spatial choice behaviour; Strategic choice; Uncertainty;

D O I：

10.1007/s10708-007-9045-4

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Models of spatial choice behaviour have been around in geography urban planning for decades to assess the feasibility of planning actions or to predict external (competition) effects on existing destinations. Although these models differ in terms of complexity and key concepts, they all have in common that spatial choice behaviour is predicted as a function of the attributes of the choice alternatives and distance or travel time separation only. None of these models do take into account that the attributes of choice alternatives and travel time may be highly non-stationary and that often the utility that people derive from visiting a particular location also depends on the choice behaviour of other individuals. Under these circumstances, individuals may exhibit strategic choice behaviour. That is, they will choose particular choice options taking into account their expected behaviour of others such as to maximize their own utility. The purpose of the proposed paper is to discuss possible models of strategic choice behaviour for these urban planning problems. Theory will be outlined and some critical issues in the application of such models to problems of spatial choice will be discussed. © 2007 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.

引用

页码：195 / 206

页数：11

共 25 条

[1]

Arentze T.A., Oppewal H., Timmermans H.J.P., A multipurpose shopping trip model to assess retail agglomeration effects, Journal of Marketing Research, 42, pp. 109-115, (2005)

[2]

Baxter M., Ewing G., Models of recreational trip distribution, Regional Studies, 15, pp. 327-344, (1981)

[3]

Camerer C.F., Behavioral game theory: Experiments on strategic interaction, (2003)

[4]

Camerer C.F., Ho T.-H., Experience-weighted attraction learning in normal-form games, Econometrica, 67, pp. 827-874, (1999)

[5]

Camerer C.F., Ho T.-H., Chong J.K., Models of thinking, learning and teaching in games, American Economic Review, 93, pp. 192-195, (2003)

[6]

Crouch G.I., Louviere J.J., A review of choice modeling research in tourism, hospitality and leisure, Tourism Analysis, 5, pp. 97-104, (2000)

[7]

Dellaert B., Arentze T.A., Borgers A.W.J., Timmermans H.J.P., Bierlaire M., A conjoint-based multipurpose multi-stop model of consumer shopping centre choice, Journal of Marketing Research, 35, pp. 177-188, (1998)

[8]

Dellaert B.G.C., Borgers A.W.J., Timmermans H.J.P., Consumer activity pattern choice: Development and test of stage dependent conjoint choice experiments, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 4, pp. 25-38, (1997)

[9]

Fehr E., Fischbacher U., Why social preference matter-the impact of non-selfish motive on competition, cooperation and incentives, The Economic Journal, 112, (2002)

[10]

Fehr E., Schmidt K.M., A theory of fairness, competition and cooperation, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, pp. 817-868, (1999)

← 1 2 3 →