Hyperoxemic Perfusion for Treatment of Reperfusion Microvascular Ischemia in Patients with Myocardial Infarction

被引:28
作者
Antonio L. Bartorelli
机构
[1] University of Milan,Centro Cardiologico “Monzino” IRCCS, Institute of Cardiology
关键词
Acute Myocardial Infarction; Left Ventricular Function; Wall Motion Score Index; Piston Chamber; Left Anterior Descend Coronary Artery;
D O I
10.2165/00129784-200303040-00004
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) primary angioplasty and stent placement is a more effective and better tolerated treatment than thrombolysis, and therefore, when logistics allow, this treatment is preferred and routinely used. However, successful reopening of an occluded coronary artery does not necessarily lead to recovery of left ventricular (LV) function. Post-AMI reduction in contractile function and ventricular remodeling may result in heart failure.There is evidence that reduced contractile function in the infarct zone is related to poor microvascular perfusion even after normalization of large-vessel flow by angiographic criteria following coronary recanalization. Failure to re-establish adequate tissue perfusion may be because of reperfusion injury, ischemia-induced microvascular damage, and plugging of the microcirculation by thrombus and plaque during mechanical recanalization. Experimental data support the hypothesis that reperfusion microvascular ischemia contributes to myocardial tissue injury over a prolonged time period.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 263
页数:10
相关论文
共 190 条
[1]  
Weaver W.D.(1997)Comparison of primary coronary angioplasty and intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review JAMA 278 2093-8
[2]  
Simes R.J.(1998)A clinical trial comparing primary stenting of the infarct-related artery with optimal primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: results from the Florence Randomized Elective Stenting in Acute Coronary Occlusions (FRESCO) trial J Am Coll Cardiol 31 1234-9
[3]  
Betriu A.(1998)Randomized comparison of coronary stenting with balloon angioplasty in selected patients with acute myocardial infarction Circulation 97 2502-5
[4]  
Antoniucci D.(1998)In-hospital and late results of coronary stenting versus conventional balloon angioplasty in selected patients with acute myocardial infarction (GRAMI trial) Am J Cardiol 81 1286-91
[5]  
Santoro G.M.(1999)Primary stent implantation is superior to balloon angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction: final results of the primary angioplasty versus stent implantation in acute myocardial infarction (PASTA) trial Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 48 262-8
[6]  
Bolognese L.(2000)A comparison of systematic stenting and conventional balloon angioplasty during primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. STENTIM-2 Investigators J Am Coll Cardiol 35 1729-36
[7]  
van Suryapranata H.(2000)Coronary stenting plus platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade compared with tissue plasminogen activator in acute myocardial infarction N Engl J Med 343 385-91
[8]  
Hof A.(1974)The “no-reflow” phenomenon after temporary coronary occlusion in the dog J Clin Invest 54 1496-508
[9]  
Hoorntje J.(1990)Progressive failure of coronary flow during reperfusion of myocardial infarction: documentation of the no-reflow phenomenon with positron emission tomography J Am Coll Cardiol 16 695-704
[10]  
Rodriguez A.(1989)Discrepancies between the effect of coronary reperfusion on survival and left ventricular function Lancet I 1367-9