The role of landmarks in cotton-top tamarin spatial foraging: Evidence for geometric and non-geometric features

被引:34
作者
Deipolyi A. [1 ,2 ]
Santos L. [1 ,2 ]
Hauser M.D. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge
[2] Harvard University, Cambridge
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Geometric features; Landmarks; Primates; Spatial foraging;
D O I
10.1007/s100710100103
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We report experiments on captive cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) designed to explore two components of spatial foraging. First, do tamarins have the capacity to extract geometric information concerning the spatial relationship between a landmark and a piece of food located above or below it? Second, when tamarins use a landmark to find a target location, what non-geometric features of the landmark do they encode? To explore these problems, we created an artificial jungle environment and trained subjects to find food either above or below a target object (i.e., landmark). Once subjects successfully located the food, we transformed various features associated with the landmark, including its color, orientation, and shape; we also manipulated the landmark- food reward distance, the overall shape of the jungle, and the number and position of landmarks. Results showed that the tamarins' success in finding the food reward was not affected by landmark color, orientation, number, or overall shape of the jungle, suggesting that with respect to the particular test conditions, these features are not relevant to the representation of a landmark. Subjects also generalized to novel landmark-food distances, suggesting that they had integrated geometric (i.e., above/below) with non-geometric (i.e., color/shape) features. Performance was negatively affected by changes to the shape of the landmark, indicating that this feature is critical to the representation of a landmark. © Springer-Verlag 2001.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 108
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Biegler R., Morris R.G.M., Landmark stability is a prerequisite for spatial but not discrimination learning, Nature, 361, pp. 631-633, (1993)
[2]  
Cheng K., A purely geometric module in the rat's spatial representation, Cognition, 23, pp. 149-178, (1986)
[3]  
Cheng K., Spetch M., Mechanisms of landmark use in mammals and birds, Spatial Representation In Animals, pp. 1-17, (1998)
[4]  
Collett T.S., Cartwright B.A., Smith B.A., Landmark learning and visuospatial memories in gerbils, J Comp Physiol A, 158, pp. 835-851, (1986)
[5]  
Etienne S., Poucet B., Thinus-Blanc C., Landmark use and the cognitive map in the rat, Spatial Representation In Animals, pp. 119-132, (1998)
[6]  
Gallistel C.R., The Organization of Learning, (1990)
[7]  
Garber P., Feeding ecology and behaviour of the genus Saguinus, Marmosets and Tamarins, pp. 273-295, (1993)
[8]  
Garber P., Dolins F., Testing learning paradigms in the field: Evidence for use of spatial and perceptual information and rule-based foraging in wild moustached tamarins, Adaptive Radiations of Neotropical Primates, pp. 201-216, (1996)
[9]  
Gouteux S., Vauclair J., Thinus-Blanc C., Reaction to spatial novelty and exploratory strategies in baboons, Anim Learn Behav, 27, pp. 323-332, (1999)
[10]  
Gouteux S., Thinus-Blanc C., Vauclair J., Rhesus monkeys use geometric and non-geometric information during a reorientation task, J Exp Psychol: Gen Proc