Enhancing justice?

被引：8

作者：

Garcia T. ^{[1
]}

Sandler R. ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Center for Animals and Public Policy, Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine, Tufts University, North Grafton, MA 01536

[2] Department of Philosophy and Religion, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115

来源：

NanoEthics | 2008年 / 2卷 / 3期

基金：

美国国家科学基金会;

关键词：

Human enhancement; Social context; Social justice;

D O I：

10.1007/s11569-008-0048-5

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

This article focuses on the follow question: Are human enhancement technologies likely to be justice impairing or justice promoting? We argue that human enhancement technologies may not be inherently just or unjust, but when situated within obtaining social contexts they are likely to exacerbate rather than alleviate social injustices. © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008.

引用

页码：277 / 287

页数：10

共 19 条

[1]

Bello W., Cunningham S., Rau B., Dark victory: The United States and global poverty, Food First, (1999)

[2]

Birch K., Beneficence, determinism, and justice: An engagement with the argument for the genetic selection of intelligence, Bioethics, 19, 1, pp. 12-28, (2005)

[3]

Bostrom N., Ord T., The reversal test: Eliminating status quo bias in applied ethics, Ethics, 116, 4, pp. 656-679, (2006)

[4]

Bostrom N., Sandberg A., Cognitive enhancement: Methods, ethics, regulatory challenges, Science and Engineering Ethics, (2008)

[5]

Buchanan A., Brock D.W., Daniels N., From Chance to Choice: Genetics and Justice, (2000)

[6]

DeNavas-Walt C., Proctor B.D., Lee C.H., Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2004, (2005)

[7]

(1999)

[8]

Harper B., Beauty, stature and the labour market: A British cohort study, Oxf Bull Econ Stat, 62, 1, pp. 771-800, (2000)

[9]

Judge T., The effect of physical height on workplace success and income: Preliminary test of a theoretical model, J Appl Psychol, 89, 3, pp. 428-441, (2004)

[10]

Kurzweil R., The Singularity Is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology, (2005)

← 1 2 →