The capitalist composition of organic: The potential of markets in fulfilling the promise of organic agriculture

被引:123
作者
Allen P. [1 ,3 ]
Kovach M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Center for Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA
[2] Department of Environmental Studies, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA
[3] Center for Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, University of California, Santa Cruz
关键词
Commodity fetishism; Ecological soundness; Green consumerism; Input substitution; National Organic Standards; Organic agriculture; Organic agriculture - environmental benefits; Organic agriculture - scientific justification; Organic agriculture growth;
D O I
10.1023/A:1007640506965
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Observers of agriculture and the environment have noted the recent remarkable growth of the organic products industry. Is it possible for this growth in the organics market to contribute to progressive environmental and social goals? From the perspective of green consumerism, the organics market is a powerful engine for positive change because it promotes greater environmental awareness and responsibility among producers and consumers alike. Given its environmental benefits and its ability to use and alter capitalist markets, organic agriculture is currently a positive force for environmentalism. Still, there are contradictions between organic ideals and practice - e.g., the reductionism of organic standards, the limitations of private organic certification, and the widespread practice of input-substitution - that emerge through the dynamics of the capitalist market. As the market matures, these contradictions will increasingly undermine the very environmental benefits that are the foundation of organic agriculture. Fundamental change, therefore, is not likely to occur through the market alone. There are ways, however, that the organics market could contribute to a broader movement leading to collective action. For instance, the organics market tends to undermine commodity fetishism in the agrifood system, thereby strengthening civil society. In addition, the market provides space and resources for social movement activity, such as in the struggle over the National Organic Standards. © 2000 Kluwer Academic Publishers.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 232
页数:11
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Allen P., Connecting the social and the ecological in sustainable agriculture, Food for the Future: Conditions and Contradictions of Sustainability, (1993)
[2]  
Allen P., The Human Face of Sustainable Agriculture: Adding People to the Environmental Agenda, (1994)
[3]  
Allen P., Sachs C., Sustainable agriculture in the United States: Engagements, silences, and possibilities for transformation, Food for the Future: Conditions and Contradictions of Sustainability, (1993)
[4]  
Anton Dunn J., Certified Organic Production in the United States: Half a Decade of Growth, (1997)
[5]  
Beck U., Risk Society, (1986)
[6]  
Belasco W.J., Appetite for Change: How the Counter-culture Took on the Food Industry, (1993)
[7]  
Bird E., Why 'modern' agriculture is environmentally unsustainable: Implications for the politics of the sustainable agriculture movement in the U.S., Global Perspectives on Agroecology and Sustainable Agricultural Systems, 1, (1988)
[8]  
Buck D., Getz C., Guthman J., From farm to table: The organic vegetable commodity chain of Northern California, Sociologia Ruralis, 37, 1, pp. 4-20, (1997)
[9]  
Burros M., U.S. planning tough rules for growing organic food, New York Times, (2000)
[10]  
Cohen B., Foreword, The Green Consumer, (1990)