Functional referents and acoustic similarity revisited: The case of barbary macaque alarm calls

被引:36
作者
Fischer J. [1 ]
Hammerschmidt K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Max-Planck-Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, 04103 Leipzig
[2] Deutsches Primatenzentrum Göttingen, Abteilung Neurobiologie, 37077 Göttingen
关键词
Alarm calls; Barbary macaques; Communication; Playbacks;
D O I
10.1007/s100710100093
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Barbary macaques (Macaca sylvanus) utter "shrill barks" in response to disturbances in their surroundings. In some cases, the majority of group members react by running away or climbing up a tree. In many other instances, however, group members show no overt reaction to these calls. We conducted a series of playback experiments to identify the factors underlying subjects' responses. We presented calls given in response to dogs that had elicited escape responses and calls that had failed to do so. We also presented calls given in response to snakes and to the observer approaching the sleeping-trees at night. An acoustic analysis of the calls presented in the playback experiments (electronic supplementary material, audioclip S1) revealed significant differences among calls given in response to dogs, the observer approaching at night, and snakes. However, the analysis did not detect any differences between calls given in response to dogs that were related to whether or not they had elicited escape responses in the first place. Correspondingly, after playback of calls given in response to dogs, we observed no difference in subjects' responses in relation to whether or not the calls had initially elicited escape responses. Subjects showed startle or escape responses significantly more often after playbacks of calls given in response to dogs than after calls given in response to observers. Playbacks of calls given in response to snakes failed to elicit specific responses such as standing bipedally or scanning the grass. Although these findings may imply that responses depend on the external referent, they also indicate that there is no clear-cut relationship between the information available to the listeners and their subsequent responses. This insight forces us to extend current approaches to identifying the meaning of animal signals. © Springer-Verlag 2001.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 35
页数:6
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Beeman K., SIGNAL Operation Manual, (1996)
[2]  
Blumstein D.T., Alarm calling in three species of marmots, Behaviour, 136, pp. 731-757, (1999)
[3]  
Cheney D.L., Seyfarth R.M., Assessment of meaning and the detection of unreliable signals by vervet monkeys, Anim Behav, 36, pp. 477-486, (1988)
[4]  
Cheney D.L., Seyfarth R.M., How Monkeys See the World, (1990)
[5]  
Cresswell W., Song as a pursuit-deterrent signal, and its occurrence relative to other anti-predation behaviors of the skylark (Aluada arvensis) on attack by merlins (Falco columbarius), Behav Ecol Sociobiol, 34, pp. 217-223, (1994)
[6]  
Dittus W., Evans C.S., Evans L., Marler P., Godfray H.C., Toque macaque food calls: Semantic communication concerning food distribution in the environment, Anim Behav, 352, pp. 328-330, (1991)
[7]  
Elowson A.M., Tannenbaum P.L., Snowdon C.T., Food-associated calls correlate with food preferences in cotton-top tamarins, Anim Behav, 42, pp. 931-937, (1991)
[8]  
Evans C.S., Evans L., Chicken food calls are functionally referential, Anim Behav, 58, pp. 307-319, (1999)
[9]  
Fischer J., Barbary macaques categorise shrill barks into two call types, Anim Behav, 55, pp. 799-807, (1998)
[10]  
Fischer J., Hammerschmidt K., Todt D., Factors affecting acoustic variation in Barbary macaque (Macaca sylvanus) disturbance calls, Ethology, 101, pp. 51-66, (1995)