A comparative study of research performance in nanotechnology for China’s inventor–authors and their non-inventing peers

被引:5
作者
Jiancheng Guan
Gangbo Wang
机构
[1] Fudan University,School of Management
[2] Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,School of Management
来源
Scientometrics | 2010年 / 84卷
关键词
University patenting; Nanotechnology; Inventor–authors; Bibliometrics;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper explores the relationship between patenting and publishing in the field of nanotechnology for Chinese universities. With their growing patents, Chinese universities are becoming main technological source for nanotechnology development that is extremely important in China. Matching names of patentees to names of research paper authors in Chinese universities, we find 6,321 authors with patents, i.e. inventor–authors, and 65,001 without any patent. Research performance is measured using three indicators—publication counts, total citations and h-index received by each researcher. It is found that research performance of authors who are also inventors holding patents is better than that of those authors who do not have a patent, and that most of high quality research is performed by inventor–authors. Our findings indicate that patent-oriented research may produce better results.
引用
收藏
页码:331 / 343
页数:12
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Bai CL(2005)Ascent of nanoscience in China Science 309 61-63
  • [2] Braun T(1997)Nanoscience and nanotechnology on the balance Scientometrics 38 321-325
  • [3] Schubert A(2006)An informetric model for the Hirsch-index Scientometrics 69 121-129
  • [4] Zsindely S(1972)Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation Science 178 471-479
  • [5] Egghe L(2006)University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging European evidence Research Policy 35 790-807
  • [6] Rousseau R(2007)China’s emerging presence in nanoscience and nanotechnology: A comparative bibliometric study of several nanoscience ‘giants’ Research Policy 36 880-886
  • [7] Garfield E(2005)An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research out-put Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102 16569-16572
  • [8] Geuna A(2003)Publications and patents in nanotechnology: An overview of previous studies and the state of the art Scientometrics 58 507-527
  • [9] Nesta LJJ(2005)Key labs and open labs in the Chinese scientific research system: Qualitative and quantitative evaluation indicators Research Evaluation 14 103-109
  • [10] Guan J(2008)Quality vs. quantity of publications in nanotechnology field from the People’s Republic of China Chinese Science Bulletin 53 1272-1280