Principals' perceptions of barriers to teacher dismissal

被引:2
作者
Painter S.R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State University West,
来源
Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education | 2000年 / 14卷 / 3期
关键词
Middle School; School District; Evaluation Policy; Significant Barrier; School Principal;
D O I
10.1023/A:1008144215978
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Although scholars and popular press writers are critical of school district failures to remove inadequately performing teachers, little has been said about the thinking of principals on this issue. Because principals are the front-line implementers of evaluation policy, their beliefs about barriers (real or perceived) are likely to influence their actions. This study asked elementary and middle school principals in the state of Oregon to identify barriers to deal effectively with inadequately performing teachers. Results demonstrated that principals believe teacher unions to be the most significant barrier, and blame the union representatives more often than the language of the negotiated contract. In addition, principals identify the amount of time required to engage in the process as a barrier. Continued study of principal beliefs about these factors may suggest (1) areas of needed reform in the implementation of evaluation and (2) administrative training needs. © 2000 Kluwer Academic Publishers.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 264
页数:11
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Blackman M.C., Fenwick L.T., The Principalship: Looking for Leaders in a Time of Change, Education Week, 19, 29, (2000)
[2]  
Bridges E.M., The Incompetent Teacher: Managerial Responses, (1992)
[3]  
Chase R.F., National Press Club, (1997)
[4]  
Demitchell T.A., Fossey R., The Limits of Law-Based School Reform: Vain Hopes and False Promises, (1997)
[5]  
Ellett C.D., Emerging Teacher Performance Assessment Practices: Implications for the Instructional Supervision Role of the School Principal, Instructional Leadership: Concepts, Issues and Controversies, pp. 302-327, (1987)
[6]  
Ellett C.D., Garland J., Teacher Evaluation Practices in our 100 Largest School Districts: Are They Living up to "State-of-the-Art" Systems?, Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1, 1, pp. 69-92, (1987)
[7]  
Hunter M., Effecting a Reconciliation between Supervision and Evaluation: A Reply to Popham, Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1, 3, pp. 275-280, (1988)
[8]  
Lavely C., Berger N., Follman J., Actual Incidence of Incompetent Teachers, Educational Research Quarterly, 15, 2, pp. 11-14, (1992)
[9]  
Lieberman M., Teachers Evaluating Teachers: Peer Review and the New Unionism, (1998)
[10]  
Leithwood K.A., Begley P.T., Cousins J.B., The Nature, Causes and Consequences of Principals' Practices: An Agenda for Future Research, Journal of Educational Administration, 28, 4, pp. 5-31, (1990)