S-1 in gastric cancer: a comprehensive review

被引:89
作者
Yoshihiko Maehara
机构
[1] Kyushu University,Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences
关键词
S-1; Gastric cancer; Comprehensive review;
D O I
10.1007/s10120-003-0232-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The current basic and clinical studies of S-1 (TS-1®) were reviewed. S-1 is a novel oral dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) inhibitory fluoropyrimidine (DIF) based on a biochemical modulation of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU); S-1 contains tegafur (FT) and two types of enzyme inhibitor; 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine (CDHP) and potassium oxonate (Oxo) in a molar ratio of 1 : 0.4 : 1. In pharmacokinetic studies, S-1 showed high 5-FU concentration in blood for long periods of time. In a combined analysis of two pivotal late phase II studies in gastric cancer, the overall response rate was 44.6% (45/101), and median survival time and 1-year survival rate were 244 days and 37%, respectively. A postmarketing survey was conducted, and in the interim analysis, tolerability and safety profiles were shown in 3294 patients with gastric cancer. The oral dose form and low incidence of adverse reactions permit treatment on an outpatient basis. To evaluate the survival benefit of S-1 in advanced gastric cancer, a phase III study of S-1 vs 5-FU vs cisplatin (CDDP) plus irinotecan (CPT-11) has been conducted. The effect of S-1 in adjuvant chemotherapy is also promising. Currently, a phase III study of surgery alone vs S-1 in patients with curative resection of gastric cancer is in progress. Further therapeutic benefits are expected to be gained by combining S-1 with other chemotherapeutic agents. Several preliminary results of combination phase I/II studies of S-1 with CDDP or CPT-11 have recently been obtained, and phase II studies are in progress. Thus, S-1 is currently the first candidate as the standard anticancer drug for gastric cancer. Further evaluations by well-controlled clinical trials are still needed.
引用
收藏
页码:2 / 8
页数:6
相关论文
共 252 条
[1]
Grem JL(2000)5-Fluorouracil: forty-plus and still ticking. A review of its preclinical and clinical development Invest New Drugs 18 299-313
[2]
Analysis Meta(1998)Group in Cancer. Efficacy of intravenous continuous infusion of fluorouracil compared with bolus administration in advanced cancer J Clin Oncol 16 301-8
[3]
Analysis Meta(1998)Group in Cancer. Toxicity of fluorouracil in patients with advanced gastric cancer: effect of administration schedule and prognostic factors J Clin Oncol 16 3537-41
[4]
Moynihan T(1998)Continuous 5-fluorouracil infusion in advanced gastric carcinoma Am J Clin Oncol 11 461-4
[5]
Hansen R(1996)Development of a novel form of an oral 5-fluorouracil derivative (S-1) directed to the potentiation of the tumor selective cytotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil by two biochemical modulators Anticancer Drugs 7 548-57
[6]
Anderson T(1977)Comparative studies on the metabolism of 2-(tetrahydrofuryl)-5-fluorouracil and 5-fluorouracil Gann 68 553-60
[7]
Quebbeman E(1989)Effects of the plasma concentration of 5-fluorouracil and the duration of continuous venous infusion of 5-fluorouracil with an inhibitor of 5-fluorouracil degradation on Yoshida sarcomas in rats Jpn J Cancer Res 80 167-72
[8]
Beatty P(1979)Co-administration of uracil or sytosine on antitumor activity of FT207 or 5-FU derivatives Jpn J Cancer Chemother 6 1097-103
[9]
Ausman R(1998)Uracil-Tegafur in gastric carcinoma: a comprehensive review J Clin Oncol 16 2877-85
[10]
Shirasaka T(2002)Randomized comparative study of tegafur/uracil and oral leucovorin versus parenteral fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer J Clin Oncol 20 3617-27