Clinical pharmacologic considerations for HIV-1 protease inhibitors

被引:7
作者
Peter L. Anderson
Courtney V. Fletcher
机构
[1] University of Minnesota,Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology
关键词
Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type; Lamivudine; Ritonavir; Virologic Response; Indinavir;
D O I
10.1007/s11908-001-0079-3
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Many data associate low protease inhibitor plasma concentrations with suboptimal virologic responses, whereas relatively few data associate high plasma concentrations with increased likelihood of toxicity. Knowledge of relationships between concentrations and virologic response is important because significant variability in plasma concentrations exists among HIV-infected persons. Unfortunately, a prospectively confirmed therapeutic range that reduces the risk of virologic failure has not been established for the protease inhibitors. Recent investigations have identified a relationship between the measured minimum plasma concentration, the in vitro susceptibility of the subject’s virus, and virologic outcome. However, differences in virologic response may further depend on other pharmacologic factors such as protein binding, intracellular kinetics, expression of drug transporters, and drug synergies or antagonisms. In the future, dosing strategies that accommodate the variability in both pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics may improve virologic outcomes. In summary, clinical pharmacologic considerations for protease inhibitors can be used to promote their optimal use.
引用
收藏
页码:381 / 387
页数:6
相关论文
共 130 条
[1]  
Drusano GL(1998)Report of the NIH panel to define principles of therapy of HIV infection and guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in HIV-infected adults and adolescents MMWR 47 1-41
[2]  
Bilello JA(1998)Factors influencing the emergence of resistance to indinavir: role of virologic, immunologic, and pharmacologic variables J Infect Dis 178 360-367
[3]  
Stein DS(1999)Natural history of HIV infection in the era of combination antiretroviral therapy AIDS 13 1933-1942
[4]  
Moore RD(1999)Outcome and predictors of failure of highly active antiretroviral therapy: one-year follow-up of a cohort of human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected persons J Infect Dis 179 790-798
[5]  
Chaisson RE(2000)Predictors of virological success and ensuing failure in HIV-positive patients starting highly active antiretroviral therapy in Europe: results from the EuroSIDA study Arch Intern Med 160 1123-1132
[6]  
Wit FW(1999)Predictors of optimal virological response to potent antiretroviral therapy AIDS 13 1873-1880
[7]  
van Leeuwen R(2000)Adherence to protease inhibitor therapy and outcomes in patients with HIV infection Ann Intern Med 133 21-30
[8]  
Weverling GJ(1999)Pharmacologic considerations for therapeutic success with antiretroviral agents Ann Pharmacother 33 989-995
[9]  
Paredes R(2000)Pharmacodynamics of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease inhibitors Clin Infect Dis 30 S151-S159
[10]  
Mocroft A(2000)Dual protease inhibitor therapy in HIV-infected patients: pharmacologic rationale and clinical benefits Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 40 649-674