Analysis of 59 cases of emergent peripartum hysterectomies during a 13-year period

被引:27
作者
Özden S. [1 ,2 ]
Yildirim G. [1 ]
Basaran T. [1 ]
Gurbuz B. [1 ]
Dayicioglu V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Zeynep Kamil Women Children Educ. R., Istanbul
[2] Kosuyolu, Uskudar, Istanbul, K. C. s., V. s., 21. B., K.: 3
关键词
Caesarean hysterectomy; Emergent peripartum hysterectomy; Postpartum hysterectomy;
D O I
10.1007/s00404-004-0647-5
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The objective was to investigate the incidence, indications, and risk factors of peripartum emergent hysterectomy. Method: Fifty-nine cases of emergent peripartum hysterectomy performed at Zeynep Kamil Women and Children's Education and Research Hospital during a 13-year period between January 1990 and January 2003 were evaluated retrospectively. Emergent peripartum hysterectomy was defined as that performed for haemorrhage unresponsive to other therapeutic interventions within the first 24 h of delivery. Result: Emergent peripartum hysterectomy was performed in 59 cases of 234,958 women (25.1/100,000). Total and subtotal hysterectomy was performed in 25 and 34 cases respectively. The rates of emergent peripartum hysterectomy after vaginal and caesarean deliveries were 8.7/100,000 and 104.5/100,000 respectively. Uterine atony was the most frequent indication (62.7%). The rates of emergent peripartum hysterectomy due to uterine atony in primiparous and multiparous women were 61.1 and 65.2% respectively. The rate of maternal mortality was 8% (5 cases). Conclusion: Uterine atony was the most common indication for emergent peripartum hysterectomy. © Springer-Verlag 2004.
引用
收藏
页码:363 / 367
页数:4
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
Sturdee D.W., Rushton D.I., Caesarean and post-partum hysterectomy 1968-1983, Br J Obstet Gynecol, 93, pp. 270-274, (1986)
[2]  
Hill D.J., Beischer N.A., Hysterectomy in obstetric practice, Aust NZ J Obstet Gynecol, 20, pp. 151-153, (1980)
[3]  
Rachagen S.P., Sivanesaratnam V., Caesarean hysterectomy - A review of 21 cases in the University Hospital, Kuala Lumpur, Eur J Obstet Reprod Biol, 16, pp. 321-326, (1984)
[4]  
Zelop C.M., Harlow B.L., Frigoletto F.D.J., Safon L.E., Saltzman D.H., Emergent peripartum hysterectomy, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 168, pp. 1443-1448, (1993)
[5]  
Gardeil F., Daly S., Turner M.J., Peripartum hysterectomy. Report of eleven cases, Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet, 90, pp. 431-434, (1995)
[6]  
Barclay D.L., Caesarean hysterectomy, Obstet Gynecol, 35, pp. 120-131, (1970)
[7]  
Kastner E.S., Figueroa R., Carry D., Maulik D., Emergent peripartum hysterectomy: Experience at a community teaching hospital, Obstet Gynecol, 99, pp. 971-975, (2002)
[8]  
Stanco L.M., Schrimmer D.B., Paul R.H., Mishell D.R., Emergent peripartum hysterectomy and associated risk factors, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 64, pp. 376-380, (1984)
[9]  
Clark S.L., Koonings P.P., Phelan J.P., Placenta previa/accreta and prior caesarean section, Obstet Gynecol, 66, pp. 89-92, (1985)
[10]  
Zorlu G., Turan C., Isik A.Z., Danisman N., Mungan T., Gokmen O., Emergent hysterectomy in modern obstetric practice, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 77, pp. 186-190, (1998)