A review of the feedbacks between bivalve grazing and ecosystem processes

被引:26
作者
Prins T.C. [1 ,3 ]
Smaal A.C. [2 ]
Dame R.F. [3 ]
机构
[1] Netherlands Institute of Ecology, Ctr. for Estuarine and Coast. Ecol., 4400 AC Yerseke
[2] Natl. Inst. Coast. and Mar. Mgmt., RIKZ, 4330 EA Middelburg
[3] Coastal Carolina University, Marine Science Department, Conway
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Carrying capacity; Nutrient cycling; Phytoplankton; Primary production; Suspension-feeding bivalves;
D O I
10.1023/A:1009924624259
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper gives an overview of interactions between bivalve grazing and ecosystem processes, that may affect the carrying capacity of ecosystems for bivalve suspension feeders. These interactions consist of a number of positive and negative feedbacks. Bivalve grazing can result in local food depletion, which may negatively influence bivalve growth. On a larger scale, it may induce a top-down control of phytoplankton biomasss, and structural shifts in phytoplankton composition. In the case of harmful algal blooms, phytoplankton may negatively affect bivalve grazing rates. The processing of large amounts of particulate matter may change nutrient cycling on the scale of estuaries, and can result in changes in the inorganic nutrient pool available for phytoplankton, through regeneration and reduced storage of nutrients in algal biomass. This can reduce nutrient limitation of the phytoplankton and stimulate algal growth rates. Observations from mesocosm studies suggest that a positive feedback from bivalve grazing on phytoplankton growth may also change the physiological state of the algae and improve food quality.
引用
收藏
页码:349 / 359
页数:10
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]  
Asmus H., Asmus R., Reise K., Exchange processes in an intertidal mussel bed: A Sylt-flume study in the Wadden Sea, Ber Biol Anst Helgoland, 6, pp. 1-79, (1990)
[2]  
Asmus H., Asmus R.M., Frances Zubillaga G., Do mussel beds intensify the phosphorus exchange between sediment and tidal waters?, Ophelia, 41, pp. 37-55, (1995)
[3]  
Asmus R.M., Asmus H., Mussel beds: Limiting or promoting phytoplankton?, J Exp Mar Biol Ecol, 148, pp. 215-232, (1991)
[4]  
Baudinet D., Alliot E., Berland B., Grenz C., Plante-Cuny M.-R., Plante R., Salen-Picard C., Incidence of mussel culture on biogeochemical fluxes at the sediment-water interface, Hydrobiologia, 207, pp. 187-196, (1990)
[5]  
Berg J.A., Newell R.I.E., Temporal and spatial variations in the composition of seston available to the suspension feeder Crassostrea virginica, Estuar Coast Shelf Sci, 23, pp. 375-386, (1986)
[6]  
Beukema J.J., Cadee G.C., Zoobenthos response to eutrophication of the Dutch Wadden Sea, Ophelia, 26, pp. 55-64, (1986)
[7]  
Beukema J.J., Cadee G.C., Growth rates of the bivalve Macoma balthica in the Wadden Sea during a period of eutrophication: Relationships with concentrations of pelagic diatoms and flagellates, Mar Ecol Prog Ser, 68, pp. 249-256, (1991)
[8]  
Blanton J.O., Tenore K.R., Castillejo F., Atkinson L.P., Schwing F.B., Lavin A., The relationship of upwelling to mussel production in the rias on the western coast of Spain, J Mar Res, 45, pp. 497-511, (1987)
[9]  
Burkholder J.M., Glasgow Jr. H.B., Hobbs C.W., Fish kills linked to a toxic ambush-predator dinoflagellate: Distribution and environmental conditions, Mar Ecol Prog Ser, 124, pp. 43-61, (1995)
[10]  
Butman C.A., Frechette M., Geyer W.R., Starczak V.R., Flume experiments on food supply to the blue mussel Mytilus edulis L. as a function of boundary layer flow, Limnol Oceanogr, 39, pp. 1755-1768, (1994)