Need for continued use of anticoagulants after intracerebral hemorrhage

被引:16
作者
Conrado J. Estol
Carlos S. Kase
机构
[1] Boston University School of Medicine,
关键词
Warfarin; International Normalize Ratio; Intracerebral Hemorrhage; Unfractionated Heparin; Main Side Effect;
D O I
10.1007/s11936-003-0004-1
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
One of the unsolved dilemmas in cerebrovascular disease is the ideal timing to restart anticoagulant therapy (ACT) safely in patients who have suffered an intracranial hemorrhage and have an indication to continue ACT. No randomized studies with evidence-based data are available to settle this issue. Only a few reports have been published; their shortcomings include small numbers of patients evaluated retrospectively, a broad spectrum of indications for ACT, different types of hemorrhage, and variable methods of reversing and restarting ACT. Despite this variability, most reports agree that 1) ACT has to be immediately reversed to decrease the risk of hemorrhage progression; 2) a period between 1 and 2 weeks appears sufficient to allow for management and monitoring of the hemorrhage off ACT; and 3) ACT can be safely restarted after the period off of treatment. A physician confronting a patient with intracranial hemorrhage and the need for ACT faces a situation of individually focused clinical decision making. The problem rests in balancing the risks of a worsening or recurring hemorrhage on one side, and the risk of thromboembolism on the other. From available information and personal experience, an unvalidated risk stratification can be proposed to categorize patients in low- and high-risk groups for hemorrhagic complications and embolic phenomena, assigning them to 5 or 15 days off ACT, respectively. Intermediate-risk patients can have ACT restarted in 5 to 15 days from the onset of the intracranial hemorrhage. Anticoagulation should be immediately reversed. Fresh frozen plasma is the standard treatment in most institutions. Prothrombin complex concentrate is an alternative, but issues of availability make its use impractical. The use of recombinant factor VIIa is an attractive new option.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 209
页数:8
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
Hart RG(1995)Oral anticoagulants and intracerebral hemorrhage: facts and hypotheses Stroke 26 1471-1477
[2]  
Boop BS(2002)Leukoaraiosis is associated with warfarin-related hemorrhage following ischemic stroke Neurology 59 193-197
[3]  
Anderson DC(1994)Thromboembolic and bleeding complications in patients with mechanical heart valve prostheses Circulation 89 635-641
[4]  
Smith EE(1995)Optimal oral anticoagulation therapy in patients with mechanical heart valves N Engl J Med 333 11-17
[5]  
Rosand J(2002)Oral antico-agulation vs aspirin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: an individual patient meta-analysis JAMA 288 2441-2448
[6]  
Knudsen KA(2002)A population-based study of the long-term risks associated with atrial fibrillation: 20-year follow-up of the Renfrew-Paisley Study Am J Med 113 359-364
[7]  
Cannegieter SC(1997)Outcome of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in patients on anticoagulant treatment Stroke 28 6-9
[8]  
Rosendaal FR(2000)Safety of discontinuation of anticoagulation in patients with intracranial hemorrhage at high thromboembolic risk Arch Neurol 57 1710-1713
[9]  
Briet E(2000)Managing the therapeutic dilemma: patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage and urgent need for antico-agulation J Neurol 247 209-214
[10]  
Cannegieter SC(1998)The dilemma of discontinuation of anticoagulation therapy for patients with intracranial hemorrhage and mechanical heart valves Neurosurgery 42 769-773