Comparison of different feedback procedures in second language vocabulary learning

被引:2
作者
Adepoju A.A. [1 ]
Elliott R.T. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] School of Education Studies, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW
[2] School of Education Studies, University of New South Wales, Sydney
关键词
Blocking; Modality; Prompting; Reinforcement; Stimulus competition;
D O I
10.1023/A:1022859419256
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Research into the learning of Second Language (SL) vocabulary by beginning learners has indicated that the simultaneous presentation of the First and Second Language words results in blocking of the learning process by the familiar First Language (FL) word. Previous research also suggests that blocking by the First Language can be eliminated by bringing it in as informative feedback (either as a written or spoken word). Our experiments were designed to further extend this research. The use of a picture, either as feedback or simultaneously presented with its equivalent, along with the aural feedback and the conventional procedures were investigated in Experiment 1. Results revealed that pictures blocked the learning process less than the written FL word when both were presented with their SL referent. When used as feedback, however, pictures were not as good as the spoken FL word. Experiment 2 demonstrated that aural feedback was the best type of feedback when compared with the picture and written FL presentations, and that the picture feedback was better than the written feedback Taken together, the results of these two studies showed that all forms of feedback overcame the problem of blocking created by simultaneous presentation of the FL and SL words, and that aural feedback was the most effective feedback procedure. It was suggested that the superiority of aural feedback was likely to be a consequence of the use of a different input channel to that of the visually presented written SL word. © 1997 Human Sciences Press, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:477 / 495
页数:18
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Ammons R.B., Effects of knowledge of performance: A survey and tentative theoretical formulation, Journal of General Psychology, 54, pp. 279-299, (1956)
[2]  
Berlyne D.E., A theory of human curiosity, British Journal of Psychology, 45, pp. 180-191, (1954)
[3]  
Deno S.L., Effects of words and pictures as stimuli in learning language equivalents, Journal of Educational Psychology, 59, pp. 202-206, (1968)
[4]  
Durso F.T., Johnson M.K., Facilitation in naming and categorising repeated pictures and words, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, pp. 449-459, (1979)
[5]  
Elliott R.T., Adepoju A.A., First language words as extra-stimulus prompts in learning second language vocabulary, International Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, pp. 237-250, (1997)
[6]  
Glover J.A., Ronning R.R., Bruning R.H., Cognitive Psychology for Teachers, (1990)
[7]  
Hammerly H., Primary and secondary association with visual aids as semantic conveyors, International Review of Applied Linguistics, 12, pp. 119-125, (1974)
[8]  
Henmon V.A.G., Modes of presentation and retention, Psychological Review, 19, pp. 79-96, (1912)
[9]  
Jacoby L.L., Craik F.I.M., Begg I., Effects of decision difficulty on recognition and recall, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, pp. 585-600, (1979)
[10]  
James J.H., Wagner A.R., One-trial overshadowing: Evidence of distributive processing, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behaviour Processes, 6, pp. 188-205, (1980)