Is the SOGS an Accurate Measure of Pathological Gambling Among Children, Adolescents and Adults?

被引:89
作者
Robert Ladouceur
Carole Bouchard
Nadia Rhéaume
Christian Jacques
Francine Ferland
Jean Leblond
Michael Walker
机构
[1] Université Laval,École de Psychologie
[2] Université Laval,undefined
关键词
SOGS; pathological gambling; assessment; psychometric;
D O I
10.1023/A:1009443516329
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS) is widely used to assess the prevalence of pathological gambling. For a variety of reasons, this instrument may not provide an accurate rate of the prevalence of pathological gambling. In this paper, one source of error in data provided by the SOGS is investigated. It is argued that individuals may not fully understand the meaning of some items, and that clarification of the meaning of misunderstood items may in some cases lead to a changed score on the scale. The present study evaluates respondents' understanding of the SOGS items. The results from three studies are reported, each using a different sample: grade school children, adolescents and adults. It was hypothesised that (1) participants would not understand some items of the SOGS, (2) problem gamblers and probable pathological gamblers would be more inclined to interpret items incorrectly than would non-problem gamblers and, (3) consistent with the first two hypotheses, clarification of items would decrease the number of participants identified as problem gamblers or probable pathological gamblers. The data obtained supported hypotheses 1 and 3. Furthermore, hypothesis 2 was supported for grade school children, but not for adolescents or adults. These results are consistent with recent literature on endorsement and acquiescence phenomena, and have implications for prevalence studies of probable pathological gambling.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 24
页数:23
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Abbot M. W.(1996)The New Zealand National Survey of problem and pathological gambling Journal of Gambling Studies 12 143-160
[2]  
Volberg R. A.(1996)Prevalence surveys of problem and pathological gambling in Europe: The cases of Germany, Holland and Spain Journal of Gambling Studies 12 179-192
[3]  
Beconia E.(1961)Agreeing response set and social desirability Journal of Educational Psychology 33 401-415
[4]  
Couch A.(1996)Estimating the extent and degree of gambling related problems in the Australian population: A national survey Journal of Gambling Studies 12 161-178
[5]  
Keniston K.(1996)Potential and probable pathological gamblers: where do the differences lie? Journal of Gambling Studies 12 419-430
[6]  
Dickerson M. G.(1997)The correction for bias in prevalence estimation with screening tests Journal of Gambling Studies 13 343-352
[7]  
Baron E.(1991)How mental system believe American Psychologist 46 107-119
[8]  
Hong S.-M.(1996)Gambling behavior of adolescent gamblers Journal of Gambling Studies 12 305-318
[9]  
Cottrell D.(1999)Adolescent gambling behavior: A prevalence study and examination of the correlates associated with problem gambling Journal of Gambling Studies 14 319-345
[10]  
Dubé D.(1999)Why people say “yes”: A dual-process theory of acquiescence Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77 379-386