Validation of a model of personalised learning

被引:10
作者
Waldrip B. [1 ]
Yu J.J. [2 ]
Prain V. [3 ]
机构
[1] Faculty of Education, University of Tasmania, Locked Bag 1307, Launceston, 7250, TAS
[2] Faculty of Education, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 66, Hobart, 7001, TAS
[3] Faculty of Education, La Trobe University, PO Box 199, Bendigo, 3552, VIC
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Academic efficacy; Learning environment; Personalised learning; Structural equation modelling; Well being;
D O I
10.1007/s10984-016-9204-y
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This article focuses on a Personalised Learning model which has 19 scales that were used to evaluate regional students’ perceptions of their readiness to learn, assessment processes, engagement, extent to which their learning is personalised and their associations with academic efficacy, academic achievement and student well-being. The data came from an average of 2700 students during each year of a 3-year study in six schools in provincial Victoria. A previously reported instrument was developed to measure students’ and teachers’ perceptions of the above factors affecting the implementation of Personalised Learning Plans (PLPs). It employed the latest scales to assess a range of PLP indicator variables, with all scales modified for use in an Australian context and with the total number of items kept to a minimum. Only scales that were more sensitive to PLPs were used in order to minimise the length of the instrument. There were three outcome variables: academic efficacy, academic achievement and student well-being. The emergent model demonstrates that addressing personalisation of learning and well-being depends on a combination of factors rather than “just getting one factor right”. This implies that there is a need for a coherent and collaborative approach for addressing the needs of students of low socioeconomic status. © 2016, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 180
页数:11
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Arbuckle J.L., Amos 18 user’s guide, (2009)
[2]  
Department of Education and Early Childhood Development, (2005)
[3]  
Blanchard J., Teaching, learning and assessment, (2009)
[4]  
Boekaerts M., Corno L., Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention, Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54, 2, pp. 199-231, (2005)
[5]  
Butler D., Winne P.H., Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis, Review of Educational Research, 65, 3, pp. 245-281, (1995)
[6]  
Campbell R., Robinson W., Neelands J., Hewston R., Mazzoli L., Personalised learning: Ambiguities in theory and practice, British Journal of Educational Studies, 55, 2, pp. 135-154, (2007)
[7]  
Cheung G.W., Rensvold R.B., Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance, Structural Equation Modeling: A Multi-disciplinary Journal, 9, 2, pp. 233-255, (2002)
[8]  
Cutler T., Waine B., Brehony K., A new epoch of individualization? Problems with the personalization of public sector services, Public Administration, 85, 3, pp. 847-855, (2007)
[9]  
Personalised learning: A practical guide, (2008)
[10]  
In J. A. Boydston, & P. Baysinger (Eds.), (1916)