International comparisons of biotechnology policies

被引:2
作者
Chen Z. [1 ,2 ]
McDermott A. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Department of Economics, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ont. K1S 5B6
[2] Station M, Halifax, NS B3J 2V9
关键词
Intellectual Property; Capital Investment; National Policy; International Comparison; Regulatory Framework;
D O I
10.1023/A:1006960807550
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Biotechnology policies are in many respects similar across the countries studied and are of three types: industrial policies, regulatory frameworks, and protection of intellectual property. Government-funded research, seed money, and tax credits are used within all of these countries, with the majority of support concentrated in R&D and capital investment, reflecting the knowledge and capital intensity of the industry. Tariffs, quotas, and other non-tariff barriers to trade are not widely used. While the European Union enacted process-driven legislation to regulate genetically modified organisms, biotechnology-derived products in the U.S. and Japan are regulated under existing product-driven legislation. Regulatory stringency in each country appears to reflect public attitudes towards biotechnology. Labelling of genetically modified products and patentability of transgenic animals remain controversial issues that divide the U.S. and the EU. As a country with a small domestic market for biotechnology, Canada has an interest in reducing trade obstacles caused by differential national policies. © 1998 Kluwer Academic Publishers.
引用
收藏
页码:527 / 550
页数:23
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Althaus S., Survey - Biotechnology: Public opposition now on the wane, Financial Times, (1996)
[2]  
Ardley J., Hoptroff C.G.M., Protecting plant "invention": The role of plant-variety rights and patents, Trends in Biotechnology, 14, pp. 67-69, (1996)
[3]  
Borrus M., The politics of competitive erosion in the U.S. steel industry, American Industry in International Competition, pp. 60-105, (1983)
[4]  
Brock M.V., Biotechnology in Japan, (1989)
[5]  
Bio-World International, (1996)
[6]  
Bio-World International, (1996)
[7]  
Bio-World International, (1996)
[8]  
Chen Z., Adoption of new technology by a lagging country: Leapfrogging or no leapfrogging?, Pacific Economic Review
[9]  
Coombs J., P N Campbell P.N., Biotechnology Worldwide, (1991)
[10]  
Crespi R.S., Biotechnology patents and morality, Trends in Biotechnology, 15, pp. 123-129, (1997)