Vaginal immunity in bacterial vaginosis

被引:52
作者
Cauci S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Dept. of Biomed. Sci./Technologies, School of Medicine, University of Udine, 33100 Udine
关键词
Preterm Birth; Obstet Gynecol; Bacterial Vaginosis; Vaginal Fluid; Prolidase Activity;
D O I
10.1007/s11908-004-0064-8
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Vaginal immunity in response to microbial perturbation is still poorly understood and may be crucial for protection from adverse outcomes associated with bacterial vaginosis (BV). BV is the most prevalent vaginal disorder in adult women worldwide, However, its pathogenesis is still elusive. In BV-positive women, inflammatory signs are scant - approximately 50% of women are asymptomatic. The number of vaginal neutrophils in the BV-positive patient is not increased with respect to healthy women. In contrast, vaginal interleukin (IL)-1β levels are largely increased. Recent findings indicate that microbial hydrolytic enzymes could be responsible for dampening the expected proinflammatory response cascade after IL-1β increase. In other words, BV causes a large increase of vaginal IL-1β, which is not paralleled by an increase of IL-8 levels, suggesting that BV-associated factors specifically dampen IL-8. The impairment of IL-8 increase may explain the absence of neutrophil increase in most women exposed to a massive abnormal anaerobic vaginal colonization (BV). Among BV-positive women, vaginal innate immunity is strongly correlated to a specific adaptive immune response: the immunoglobulin A (IgA) against the hemolysin produced by Gardnerella vaginalis (anti-Gvh IgA), which is the main bacterium present in BV. High anti-Gvh IgA levels are protective for adverse pregnancy outcomes. However, an exaggerated inflammatory response, mainly attributed to genetic polymorphisms, is also implicated in BV-associated adverse outcomes. Copyright © 2004 by Current Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:450 / 456
页数:6
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
Eschenbach D.A., History and review of bacterial vaginosis, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 169, pp. 441-445, (1993)
[2]  
Hillier S.L., Nugent R.F., Eschenbach D.A., Et al., Association between bacterial vaginosis and preterm delivery of a low-birth-weight infant, N. Engl. J. Med., 333, pp. 1737-1742, (1995)
[3]  
McGregor J.A., French J.I., Bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy, Obstet. Gynecol. Surv., 55, (2000)
[4]  
Cauci S., Driussi S., De Santo D., Et al., Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis and vaginal flora changes in peri- and postmenopausal women, J. Clin. Microbiol., 40, pp. 2147-2152, (2002)
[5]  
Alvarez-Olmos M.I., Barousse M.M., Rajan L., Et al., Vaginal lactobacilli in adolescent presence and relationship to local and systemic immunity, and to bacterial vaginosis, Sex. Transm. Dis., 31, pp. 393-400, (2004)
[6]  
Hillier S.L., Martius J., Krohn M., Et al., A case-control study of chorionamniotic infection and histologic chorioamnionitis in prematurity, N. Engl. J. Med., 319, pp. 972-978, (1988)
[7]  
Goldenberg R.L., Culhane J.F., Infection as a cause of preterm birth, Clin. Perinatol., 30, pp. 677-700, (2003)
[8]  
Ralph S.G., Rutherford A.J., Wilson J.D., Influence of bacterial vaginosis on conception and miscarriage in the first trimester: Cohort study, Br. Med., 319, pp. 220-223, (1999)
[9]  
Sweet R.L., Gynecologic conditions and bacterial vaginosis: Implications for the non-pregnant patient, Infect. Dis. Obstet. Gynecol., 8, pp. 184-190, (2000)
[10]  
Ness R.B., Soper D.E., Holley R.L., Et al., Douching and endometritis: Results from the PID evaluation and clinical health (PEACH) study, Sex. Transm. Dis., 28, pp. 240-245, (2001)