Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory

被引:8
作者
Elisabet Garriga
Domènec Melé
机构
来源
Journal of Business Ethics | 2004年 / 53卷
关键词
corporate social responsibility; corporate responsiveness; corporate citizenship; stakeholder manage ment; corporate social performance; issues management; sustainable development; the common good;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) field presents not only a landscape of theories but also a proliferation of approaches, which are controversial, complex and unclear. This article tries to clarify the situation, “mapping the territory” by classifying the main CSR theories and related approaches in four groups: (1) instrumental theories, in which the corporation is seen as only an instrument for wealth creation, and its social activities are only a means to achieve economic results; (2) political theories, which concern themselves with the power of corporations in society and a responsible use of this power in the political arena; (3) integrative theories, in which the corporation is focused on the satisfaction of social demands; and (4) ethical theories, based on ethical responsibilities of corporations to society. In practice, each CSR theory presents four dimensions related to profits, political performance, social demands and ethical values. The findings suggest the necessity to develop a new theory on the business and society relationship, which should integrate these four dimensions.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 71
页数:20
相关论文
共 163 条
[1]  
Ackerman R. W.(1973)How Companies Respond to SocialDemands Harvard University Review 51 88-98
[2]  
Agle B. R.(1999)Who Matters to CEOs? An Investigation of Stakeholder Attributes and Salience, Corporate Performance and CEO Values Academy of Management Journal 42 507-526
[3]  
Mitchell R. K.(1998)Corporate Community Relations in the 1990s: A Study in Transformation Business and Society 37 221-228
[4]  
Altman B. W.(2000)Corporate Citizenship in the New Millennium: Foundation for an Architecture of Excellence Business and Society Review 105 145-169
[5]  
Altman B. W.(1998)The Stakeholder Theory and the Common Good Journal of Business Ethics 17 1093-1102
[6]  
Vidaver-Cohen D.(1991)Firm Resource and Sustained Competitive Advantage Journal of Management 17 99-120
[7]  
Argandoña A.(1998)Determining Best Practice in Corporate-Stakeholder Relations Using Data Envelopment Analysis Business and Society 37 306-339
[8]  
Barney J.(1999)Does Stakeholder Orientation Matter? The Relationship between Stakeholder Management Models and the Firm Financial Performance Academy of Management Journal 42 488-509
[9]  
Bendheim C. L.(1991)New Directions in Corporate Social Responsibility Business Horizons 34 56-66
[10]  
Waddock S. A.(1992)An Issue Area Approach to the Analysis of MNE-Government Relations Journal of International Business Studies 23 295-309