Evaluation of bone mineral density of the lumbar spine using a novel phantomless dual-energy CT post-processing algorithm in comparison with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

被引:24
作者
Booz C. [1 ]
Hofmann P.C. [2 ]
Sedlmair M. [2 ]
Flohr T.G. [2 ]
Schmidt B. [2 ]
D’Angelo T. [1 ,3 ]
Martin S.S. [1 ]
Lenga L. [1 ]
Leithner D. [1 ]
Vogl T.J. [1 ]
Wichmann J.L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, Frankfurt
[2] Siemens Healthcare, Computed Tomography Division, Forchheim
[3] Department of Biomedical Sciences and Morphological and Functional Imaging, University of Messina, Messina
关键词
Bone mineral density; Computed tomography; Dual-energy computed tomography; Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; Osteoporosis;
D O I
10.1186/s41747-017-0017-2
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Current techniques for evaluation of bone mineral density (BMD) commonly require phantom calibration. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a novel algorithm for phantomless in vivo dual-energy computed tomography (DECT)-based assessment of BMD of the lumbar spine in comparison with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). Methods: Data from clinically indicated DECT and DEXA examinations within two months comprising the lumbar spine of 47 patients were retrospectively evaluated. By using a novel automated dedicated post-processing algorithm for DECT, the trabecular bone of lumbar vertebrae L1–L4 was selected and analysed. Linear correlation was analysed using Pearson’s product-moment correlation coefficient for the comparison of the results from DECT and DEXA. Results: A total of 186 lumbar vertebrae in 47 patients (mean age, 58 years; age range, 24–85 years) were analysed, 24 men (mean age, 55 years; age range, 24–85 years) and 23 women (mean age, 59 years; age range, 31–80 years). Mean BMD of L1–L4 determined with DEXA was 0.985 g/cm2 and 20/47 patients (42.6%) showed an osteoporotic BMD (T score lower than – 2.5) of at least two vertebrae. Average DECT-based BMD of L1–L4 was 86.8 mg/cm3. Regression analysis demonstrated a lack of correlation between DECT- and DEXA-based BMD values with a Pearson’s product-moment correlation coefficient r = 0.4205. Conclusions: Dedicated post-processing of DECT data using a novel algorithm for retrospective phantomless BMD assessment of the trabecular bone of lumbar vertebrae from clinically indicated DECT examinations is feasible. © 2017, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]
Kanis J.A., Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: synopsis of a WHO report, Osteoporos Int, 4, pp. 368-381, (1994)
[2]
Melton L.J., How many women have osteoporosis now?, J Bone Miner Res, 10, pp. 175-177, (1995)
[3]
Burge R., Dawson-Hughes B., Solomon D.H., Et al., Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005–2025, J Bone Miner Res, 22, pp. 465-475, (2007)
[4]
Cummings S.R., Kelsey J.L., Nevitt M.C., Et al., Epidemiology of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures, Epidemiol Rev, 7, pp. 178-208, (1985)
[5]
Antonacci M.D., Hanson D.S., Heggeness M.H., Pitfalls in the measurement of bone mineral density by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry, Spine, 21, pp. 87-91, (1996)
[6]
Bolotin H.H., Sievanen H., Inaccuracies inherent in dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in vivo bone mineral density can seriously mislead diagnostic/prognostic interpretations of patient-specific bone fragility, J Bone Miner Res, 16, pp. 799-805, (2001)
[7]
Bolotin H.H., DXA in vivo BMD methodology: an erroneous and misleading research and clinical gauge of bone mineral status, bone fragility, and bone remodelling, Bone, 41, pp. 138-154, (2007)
[8]
Messina C., Bandirali M., Sconfienza L.M., Et al., Prevalence and type of errors in dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, Eur Radiol, 25, pp. 1504-1511, (2015)
[9]
Ho C.P., Kim R.W., Schaffler M.B., Et al., Accuracy of dual-energy radiographic absorptiometry of the lumbar spine: cadaver study, Radiology, 176, pp. 171-173, (1990)
[10]
Svendsen O.L., Hassager C., Skodt V., Et al., Impact of soft tissue on in vivo accuracy of bone mineral measurements in the spine, hip, and forearm: a human cadaver study, J Bone Miner Res, 10, pp. 868-873, (1995)