Optimal duration of chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

被引:46
作者
Lustberg M.B. [1 ]
Edelman M.J. [1 ]
机构
[1] University of Maryland Marlene, Stewart Greenebaum Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD 21201
关键词
Paclitaxel; Bevacizumab; Docetaxel; Gemcitabine; Carboplatin;
D O I
10.1007/s11864-007-0020-6
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
NSCLC is the leading cause of cancer mortality in the United States. Approximately 30-40% of patients present with advanced stage disease (Stage IIIb with malignant effusion and Stage IV) and the majority of those who present with 'earlier' disease will ultimately develop and succumb to metastatic lung cancer. Although platinum-based combination chemotherapy has been shown to impact overall survival and quality of life, it is not curative and less than 25% of patients survive 2 years. Therefore, the benefits of chemotherapy must be weighed against toxicity, inconvenience, and cost. Several randomized trials have shown that there is no added benefit of extending first line, platinum-based chemotherapy beyond four cycles. There was no additional survival benefit and patients experienced increased toxicity with longer durations of therapy. Attempts to improve outcome by planned sequential therapy, i.e. shifting from one cytotoxic regimen to another after a fixed number of cycles have also not been successful. Several new so-called 'targeted' therapeutic agents have recently been evaluated in clinical trials to assess whether the efficacy of first line chemotherapy with platinum doublets can be improved with the addition of these agents. These include bevacizumab, epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (erlotinib and gefitinib), bexarotene, matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors, and others. Other than bevacizumab, none have demonstrated benefit in this scenario. The design of most of these trials employed the concurrent use of the new agent with six cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy (usually either carboplatin/paclitaxel or cisplatin/gemcitabine) and then continued the new agent until relapse. Three agents have demonstrated benefit in randomized studies in the second line setting, docetaxel, pemetrexed, and erlotinib. No study has evaluated the optimal duration of therapy for these agents, though for erlotinib, it appears that use until progression is optimal. Future studies of novel agents will need to explore not only the potential use of these agents in combination or in comparison with standard therapy, but also the duration of therapy and consider issues of survival, quality of life, and cost. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 46
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Cullen M.H., Billingham L.J., Woodroffe C.M., Et al., Mitomycin, ifosfamide, and cisplatin in unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer: Effects on survival and quality of life, J Clin Oncol, 17, pp. 3188-3194, (1999)
[2]  
Chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis using updated data on individual patients from 52 randomised clinical trials - Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Collaborative Group, BMJ, 311, pp. 899-909, (1995)
[3]  
Wozniak A.J., Crowley J.J., Balcerzak S.P., Et al., Randomized trial comparing cisplatin with cisplatin plus vinorelbine in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A Southwest Oncology Group study, J Clin Oncol, 16, pp. 2459-2465, (2001)
[4]  
Sandler A.B., Nemunaitis J., Denham C., Et al., Phase III trial of gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus cisplatin alone in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer, J Clin Oncol, 18, pp. 122-130, (2000)
[5]  
D'Addario G., Pintilie M., Leighl N., Feld R., Cerny T., Shepherd F.A., Platinum -based versus non-platinum based chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis of the published literature, J Clin Oncol, 23, pp. 2926-2936, (2005)
[6]  
Clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer, J Clin Oncol, 15, pp. 2996-3018, (1997)
[7]  
Buccheri G.F., Ferrigno D., Curcia A., Et al., Continuation of chemotherapy versus supportive care alone in patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer and stable disease after two or three cycles of MACC. Results of a randomized prospective study, Cancer, 63, 3, pp. 428-432, (1989)
[8]  
Pfister D.G., Johnson D.H., Azzoli C.G., Et al., American Society of Clinical Oncology treatment of unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer guideline: Update 2003, J Clin Oncol, 22, 2, pp. 330-353, (2004)
[9]  
Smith I.E., O'Brien M.E., Talbot D.C., Et al., Duration of chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A randomized trial of three versus six courses of mitomycin, vinblastine, and cisplatin, J Clin Oncol, 19, 5, pp. 1336-1343, (2001)
[10]  
Socinski M., Schell M., Peterman A., Et al., Phase III trial comparing a defined duration of therapy versus continuous therapy followed by second line therapy in advanced stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer, J Clin Oncol, 20, pp. 1335-1343, (2002)