Prediction of neurologic morbidity in extremely low birth weight infants

被引:45
作者
Ambalavanan N. [1 ,4 ]
Nelson K.G. [1 ]
Alexander G. [2 ]
Johnson S.E. [1 ]
Biasini F. [3 ]
Carlo W.A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
[2] School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
[3] Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham
关键词
D O I
10.1038/sj.jp.7200419
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE: (1) Identify major determinants of adverse neurodevelopmental outcome in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants. (2) Compare neural networks and regression analysis in the prediction of major handicaps and Bayley scores (MDI and PDI) in individual ELBW neonates followed to 18 months. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of regional tertiary care NICU database. A database with 21 selected variables was divided into training (n=144) and test sets (n=74). The training set was used to train a neural network and develop regression equations to predict outcomes in the test set. RESULTS: Determinants (descending order of contribution to variance) : Major handicap: intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) grade, necrotizing enterocolitis≥stage II, black race, and no chorioamnionitis; low MDI: IVH grade, plurality, bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), lower maternal grade, and no chorioamnionitis; low PDI: IVH grade, BPD, periventricular leukomalacia, lower maternal grade, and no chorioamnionitis. Regression techniques and neural networks were comparable and had relatively low sensitivity and correlation with adverse outcomes. CONCLUSION: Much of the variance in ELBW neurologic outcome cannot be explained by either regression analysis or neural network approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:496 / 503
页数:7
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Bregman J., Kimberlin L.V.S., Developmental outcome in extremely premature infants: Impact of surfactant, Pediatr Clin North Am, 40, pp. 937-953, (1993)
  • [2] McCormick M.C., Has the prevalence of handicapped infants increased with improved survival of the very low birth weight infant?, Clin Perinatol, 20, pp. 263-277, (1993)
  • [3] Escobar G.J., Littenberg B., Petitti D.B., Outcome among surviving very low birth weight infants: A meta-analysis, Arch Dis Child, 66, pp. 204-211, (1991)
  • [4] Ehrenhaft P.M., Wagner J.L., Herdman R.C., Changing prognosis for very low birth weight infants, Obstet Gynecol, 74, pp. 528-535, (1989)
  • [5] Msall M.E., Buck G.M., Rogers B.T., Merke D., Catanzaro N.L., Zorn W.A., Risk factors for major neurodevelopmental impairments and need for special educational resources in extremely premature infants, J Pediatr., 119, pp. 606-614, (1991)
  • [6] Volpe J.J., Intraventricular hemorrhage and brain injury in the premature infant: Diagnosis, prognosis, and prevention, Clin Perinatol, 16, pp. 387-411, (1989)
  • [7] Pidcock F.S., Graziani L.J., Stanley C., Mitchell D.G., Merton D., Neurosonographic features of periventricular echodensities associated with cerebral palsy in preterm infants, J Pediatr, 116, pp. 417-422, (1990)
  • [8] Fawer C.L., Besnier S., Forcada M., Buclin T., Calame A., Influence of perinatal, developmental and environmental factors on cognitive abilities of preterm children without major impairments at 5 yrs, Early Hum Dev, 43, pp. 151-164, (1995)
  • [9] Fawer C.L., Calame A., Significance of ultrasound appearances in the neurological development and cognitive abilities of preterm infants at 5 yrs, Eur J Pediatr, 150, pp. 515-520, (1991)
  • [10] Sporken J.M., Hein P.R., Boon J.M., One-year morbidity in very premature infants: Prognostic value of duration of pregnancy, birthweight and neonatal morbidity, Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 20, pp. 311-318, (1985)