Validation of a general measure of treatment satisfaction, the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM), using a national panel study of chronic disease

被引:714
作者
Atkinson M.J. [1 ]
Sinha A. [2 ]
Hass S.L. [3 ]
Colman S.S. [2 ]
Kumar R.N. [4 ]
Brod M. [5 ]
Rowland C.R. [3 ]
机构
[1] Worldwide Outcomes Research, La Jolla Laboratories, Pfizer Inc., San Diego, CA 92121-1111
[2] Quintiles Strategic Research Serv., Quintiles Inc., San Francisco, CA
[3] Worldwide Outcomes Research, Pfizer Inc., San Diego, CA 92121-1111
[4] University of Michigan, College of Pharmacy, Ann Arbor, MI
[5] The BROD GROUP, Mill Valley, CA
关键词
Visual Analogue Scaling; Satisfaction Score; Treatment Satisfaction; Illness Group; Standardize Beta Coefficient;
D O I
10.1186/1477-7525-2-12
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The objective of this study was to develop and psychometrically evaluate a general measure of patients' satisfaction with medication, the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM). Methods: The content and format of 55 initial questions were based on a formal conceptual framework, an extensive literature review, and the input from three patient focus groups. Patient interviews were used to select the most relevant questions for further evaluation (n = 31). The psychometric performance of items and resulting TSQM scales were examined using eight diverse patient groups (arthritis, asthma, major depression, type I diabetes, high cholesterol, hypertension, migraine, and psoriasis) recruited from a national longitudinal panel study of chronic illness (n = 567). Participants were then randomized to complete the test items using one of two alternate scaling methods (Visual Analogue vs. Likert-type). Results: A factor analysis (principal component extraction with varimax rotation) of specific items revealed three factors (Eigenvalues > 1.7) explaining 75.6% of the total variance; namely Side effects (4 items, 28.4%, Cronbach's Alpha = .87), Effectiveness (3 items, 24.1%, Cronbach's Alpha = .85), and Convenience (3 items, 23.1%, Cronbach's Alpha = .87). A second factor analysis of more generally worded items yielded a Global Satisfaction scale (3 items, Eigenvalue = 2.3, 79.1%, Cronbach's Alpha = .85). The final four scales possessed good psychometric properties, with the Likert-type scaling method performing better than the VAS approach. Significant differences were found on the TSQM by the route of medication administration (oral, injectable, topical, inhalable), level of illness severity, and length of time on medication. Regression analyses using the TSQM scales accounted for 40-60% of variation in patients' ratings of their likelihood to persist with their current medication. Conclusion: The TSQM is a psychometrically sound and valid measure of the major dimensions of patients' satisfaction with medication. Preliminary evidence suggests that the TSQM may also be a good predictor of patients' medication adherence across different types of medication and patient populations. © 2004 Atkinson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]  
Golin C.E., DiMatteo M.R., Gelberg L., The role of patient participation in the doctor visit. Implications for adherence to diabetes care, Diabetes Care, 19, pp. 1153-1164, (1996)
[2]  
Katz J.N., Patient preferences and health disparities, JAMA, 286, pp. 1506-1509, (2001)
[3]  
Owens D.K., Spine update. Patient preferences and the development of practice guidelines, Spine, 23, pp. 1073-1079, (1998)
[4]  
Eriksen L.R., Patient satisfaction with nursing care: Concept clarification, Journal of Nursing Measurement, 3, pp. 59-76, (1995)
[5]  
Gattellari M., Butow P.N., Tattersall M.H., Sharing decisions in cancer care, Soc. Sci. Med., 52, pp. 1865-1878, (2001)
[6]  
Turnbull J.E., Luther K.M., Patient satisfaction report paves way to improved care, QRC Advisor, 13, pp. 1-7, (1996)
[7]  
Wright J.G., Evaluating the outcome of treatment. Shouldn't We be asking patients if they are better?, J. Clin. Epidemiol., 53, pp. 549-553, (2000)
[8]  
Brody D., Miller S., Lerman C., Smith D., Caputo G., Patient perception of involvement in medical care: Relationship to illness attitudes and outcomes, Journal of General Internal Medicine, 4, pp. 506-511, (1989)
[9]  
Taylor T.R., Understanding the choices that patients make, Journal of the American Board of Family Practice, 13, pp. 124-133, (2000)
[10]  
Albrecht G., Hoogstraten J., Satisfaction as a determinant of compliance, Community Dent. Oral Epidemiol., 26, pp. 139-146, (1998)