Serum cotinine as a marker of environmental tobacco smoke exposure in epidemiological studies: The experience of the MATISS project

被引:82
作者
F. Seccareccia
P. Zuccaro
R. Pacifici
P. Meli
F. Pannozzo
K.M. Freeman
A. Santaquilani
S. Giampaoli>
机构
[1] Lab. of Epidemiol. and Biostatistics, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome
[2] Laboratory of Clinical Biochemistry, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome
[3] Health Unit LT4, Latina
[4] Lab. of Epidemiol. and Biostatistics, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, I-00161 Rome, Viale Regina Elena
关键词
Misclassification; Passive smoking; Serum cotinine;
D O I
10.1023/A:1024672522802
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To describe serum cotinine levels in a rural Italian population and to examine its usefulness as an epidemiologic biomarker of nicotine exposure, cross-sectional data collected in 1993 for the MATISS Project (2098 men and 1352 women, aged 20-79 years) were used. The study population consisted of 977 current smokers, 882 nonsmokers reporting exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) and 1520 nonsmokers reporting no ETS exposure. Mean values of serum cotinine measured by radioimmunoassay for never smokers, ex-smokers and current smokers (including four categories of cigarette consumption), and for categories of ETS exposure in all nonsmokers were calculated. In univariate analysis, there was a positive association between self-reported nicotine exposure and serum cotinine levels in all groups. Using self-reported status as truth, sensitivity and specificity for various cotinine cutoff points were estimated to distinguish nonsmokers from smokers. The value of 15 ng/mL represented the best combined levels of sensitivity (95%) and specificity (96%). Using this cutoff point, the overall misclassification rate for self-reported nonsmokers was 2.1% and about two times greater for the more vs. the less educated. In multivariate analysis, reported ETS exposure among nonsmokers was significantly associated with serum cotinine even after adjusting for age, socio-demographic and behavioural factors, though the strength of the association was not strong. In conclusion, serum cotinine represents a reliable epidemiological marker of nicotine intake and may be helpful when studying ETS exposure. Improved information collection is needed to reduce misclassification among nonsmokers and enhance our understanding of the relationship between ETS and cotinine measures.
引用
收藏
页码:487 / 492
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Peto R., Lopez A.D., Boreham J., Thun M., Heath C. Jr., Mortality from Smoking in Developed Countries 1950-2000, (1994)
[2]  
Environmental Tobacco Smoke: Measuring Exposures and Assessing Health Effects, (1986)
[3]  
Respiratory Health Effects of Passive Smoking: Lung Cancer and Other Disorders, (1992)
[4]  
Wagenknecht L.E., Burke G.L., Perkins L.L., Haley N.H., Friedman G.D., Misclassification of smoking status in the CARDIA Study: A comparison of self-reported with serum cotinine levels, Am J Public Health, 82, pp. 33-36, (1992)
[5]  
Woodward M., Tunstall-Pedoe H., Smith W.C.S., Tavendale R., Smoking characteristics and inhalation biochemistry in the Scottish population, J Clin Epidemiol, 44, pp. 1405-1410, (1991)
[6]  
Wagenknecht L.E., Manolio T.A., Sidney S., Burke G.L., Haley N.J., Environmental tobacco smoke exposure as determined by cotinine in black and white young adults: The CARDIA Study, Environ Res, 63, pp. 39-46, (1993)
[7]  
Woodward M., Tunstall-Pedoe H., An iterative technique for identifying smoking deceivers with application to the Scottish Heart Health Study, Prev Med, 21, pp. 88-97, (1992)
[8]  
Benowitz N.L., Jacob P., Nicotine and cotinine elimination pharmacokinetics in smokers and nonsmokers, Clin Pharmacol Ther, 53, pp. 316-323, (1993)
[9]  
Jarvis M., Tunstall-Pedoe H., Feyerabend C., Vesey C., Salloojee Y., Biochemical markers of smoke absorption and self-reported exposure to passive smoking, J Epidem Comm Health, 38, pp. 335-339, (1984)
[10]  
Matsukura S., Taminato T., Kitano N., Et al., Effects of environmental tobacco smoke on urinary cotinine excretion in nonsmokers. Evidence for passive smoking, New Engl J Med, 311, pp. 828-832, (1984)