The practice of argumentative discussion

被引:5
作者
Hitchcock D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Philosophy, McMaster University, Hamilton
关键词
Argument; Argumentation; Argumentative discussion; Communication; Definition; Manifest rationality; Practice; Ralph Johnson; Rhetoric;
D O I
10.1023/A:1019945119167
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
I propose some changes to the conceptions of argument and of argumentative discussion in Ralph Johnson's Manifest Rationality (2000). An argument is a discourse whose author seeks to persuade an audience to accept a thesis by producing reasons in support of it and discharging his dialectical obligations. An argumentative discussion (what Johnson calls 'argumentation') is a sociocultural activity of constructing, presenting, interpreting, criticizing, and revising arguments for the purpose of reaching a shared rationally supported position on some issue. Johnson's theory of argumentative discussion, with occasional modifications, is derived from this definition as a sequence of 17 theorems. Argumentative discussion is a valuable cultural practice; it is the most secure route to correct views and wise policies. © 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers.
引用
收藏
页码:287 / 298
页数:11
相关论文
共 7 条
[1]  
Aristotle, Ars Rhetorica, (1959)
[2]  
Van Eemeren F.H., Grootendorst R., Speech Arts in Argumentative Discussions, (1984)
[3]  
Van Eemeren F.H., Grootendorst R., Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies, (1992)
[4]  
Johnson R.H., Manifest Rationality: A Pragmatic Theory of Argument, (2000)
[5]  
Willard C.A., Argumentation and the Social Grounds of Knowledge, (1983)
[6]  
Willard C.A., A Theory of Argumentation, (1989)
[7]  
Wohlrapp H., A New Light on Non-deductive Argumentation Schemes, Argumentation, 12, pp. 341-350, (1998)