A benchmarking framework for product lifecycle management (PLM) maturity models

被引:3
作者
Enrico Vezzetti
Maria Grazia Violante
Federica Marcolin
机构
[1] Politecnico di Torino,
来源
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology | 2014年 / 71卷
关键词
Product lifecycle management (PLM); Maturity models; Capability maturity model (CMM);
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Product lifecycle management (PLM) is increasingly important for organizations acting in dynamic and competitive markets since PLM can improve decision-making and reduce costs by taking advantage of the efficiencies and effectiveness coming from improved market intelligence and collaboration of partners. In the last years, academics as well as practitioners and consultants have developed a wide range of maturity models for the purpose of measuring and describing certain aspects of PLM “maturity”. The PLM maturity models permit to assess the relative position of companies on their road to complete PLM implementation. However, it is a tough job for the company to select the most appropriate PLM maturity model, as each maturity model has different attributes. Since, to our knowledge, no benchmarking for PLM maturity models exists to date, the rising number of maturity models implicates problems with respect to retrievability and reusability. With the aim to enhance the time consuming and exhausting search and selection process of appropriate assessment models, a benchmarking framework for PLM maturity models is presented in this paper.
引用
收藏
页码:899 / 918
页数:19
相关论文
共 148 条
[1]  
Batenburg R(2006)PLM roadmap: stepwise PLM implementation based on the concepts of maturity and alignment International Journal of Product Lifecycle Management 1 333-351
[2]  
Helms R(2011)Maturity assessment models: a design science research approach International Journal of Society Systems Science 3 81-98
[3]  
Versendaal J(2012)The maturity of maturity model research: a systematic mapping study Information and software technology 54 1317-1339
[4]  
Mettler T(2004)An exploration of the relationship between software development process maturity and project performance Information & Management 41 279-288
[5]  
Wendler R(2001)Extreme programming from a CMM perspective Software, IEEE 18 19-26
[6]  
Jiang JJ(2007)Software quality and IS project performance improvements from software development process maturity and IS implementation strategies Journal of Systems and Software 80 616-627
[7]  
Klein G(1998)A Guttman scaling of CMM level 2 practices: investigating the implementation sequences underlying software engineering maturity Empirical Software Engineering 3 159-177
[8]  
Hwang H-G(1997)Measuring software engineering evolution: a Rasch calibration Information Systems Research 8 95-104
[9]  
Huang J(2004)Prescription, description, reflection: the shape of the software process improvement field International Journal of Information Management 24 457-472
[10]  
Hung S-Y(2005)A maturity model for the implementation of software process improvement: an empirical study Journal of Systems and Software 74 155-172