Endoscopic treatment of ulcer bleeding

被引:18
作者
Kovacs T.O.G. [1 ]
Jensen D.M. [1 ]
机构
[1] CURE Digestive Diseases Research Center, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA 90073-1003
关键词
Endoscopic Therapy; Ulcer Bleeding; Endoscopic Hemostasis; Epinephrine Injection; Heater Probe;
D O I
10.1007/s11938-007-0066-3
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleeding secondary to ulcer disease occurs commonly and results in significant patient morbidity and medical expense. After initial resuscitation, carefully performed endoscopy provides, an accurate diagnosis of the source of the UGI hemorrhage and can reliably identify those high-risk subgroups that may benefit most from endoscopic-hemostasis. Large-channel therapeutic endoscopes are recommended. Endoscopists should be very experienced in management of patients with UGI hemorrhage, including the use of various hemostatic devices. For patients with major stigmata of ulcer hemorrhage - active arterial bleeding, nonbleeding visible vessel, and adherent clot - combination therapy with epinephrine injection and either thermal coaptive coagulation (with multipolar or heater probe) or endoclips is recommended. High-dose intravenous proton-pump inhibitors are recommended as concomitant therapy with endoscopic hemostasis of major stigmata. Patients with minor stigmata or clean-based ulcers will not benefit from endoscopic therapy and should be triaged to less intensive care and be considered for early discharge. Effective endoscopic hemostasis of ulcer bleeding can significantly improve outcomes by reducing rebleeding, transfusion requirement, and need for surgery, as well as reduce cost of medical care. Copyright © 2007 by Current Medicine Group LLC.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 148
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]
Kovacs T.O., Jensen D.M., Recent advances in the endoscopic diagnosis and therapy of upper gastrointestinal, small intestinal and colonic bleeding, Med Clin N Am, 86, pp. 1319-1356, (2002)
[2]
Jensen D.M., Where next with endoscopic ulcer hemostasis, Am J Gastroenterol, 97, pp. 2161-2165, (2002)
[3]
Jensen D.M., Savides T., Sitzer M., Et al., Demographics, risk factors and outcomes of peptic ulcer hemorrhage in the United States: Results of a large multicenter study [abstract], Gastroenterology, 124, (2003)
[4]
Wong R.C., Endoscopic Doppler US probe for acute peptic ulcer hemorrhage, Gastrointest Endosc, 60, pp. 804-812, (2004)
[5]
Lau J.Y., Sung J.J., Lee K.K., Et al., Effect of intravenous omeprazole on recurrent bleeding after endoscopic treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers, N Engl J Med, 343, pp. 310-316, (2000)
[6]
Jensen D.M., Pace S.C., Soffer E., Et al., Continuous infusion of pantoprazole versus ranitidine for prevention of ulcer rebleeding: A US multicenter randomized double-blind study, Am J Gastroenterol, 101, pp. 1991-1999, (2006)
[7]
Bardou M., Toubouti Y., Benhaberou-Brun D., Et al., Meta-analysis: Proton-pump inhibition in high-risk patients with acute peptic ulcer bleeding, Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 21, pp. 677-686, (2005)
[8]
Leontiadis G.I., Howden C.W., To establish the efficacy of PPI therapy for ulcer bleeding in the United States, do we need more patients or more PPIs?, Am J Gastroenterol, 101, pp. 2000-2002, (2006)
[9]
Jensen D.M., Treatment of patients at high risk for recurrent bleeding from a peptic ulcer, Ann Intern Med, 139, pp. 294-295, (2003)
[10]
Calvet X., Vergara M., Brullet E., Et al., Addition of a second endoscopic treatment following epinephrine injection improves outcome in high-risk bleeding ulcers, Gastroenterology, 126, pp. 441-450, (2004)