Metatheorizing citation

被引：2

作者：

Cronin B. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Sch. of Lib. and Information Science, Indiana University, Bloomington

来源：

Scientometrics | 1998年 / 43卷 / 1期

关键词：

Citation Analysis; Citation Behavior; Grand Unify Theory; Symbolic Capital; Bibliographic Coupling;

D O I：

10.1007/BF02458393

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

This paper reviews a variety of perspectives on citation. It argues that citations have multiple articulations in that they inform our understanding of the socio-cultural, cognitive, and textual aspects of scientific communication. Two metatheoretical frameworks are proposed as a means of negotiating the interpretative differences which characterize the various discourse communities concerned with citation theory and practice.

引用

页码：45 / 55

页数：10

共 46 条

[1]

Becher T., Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Culture of Disciplines, (1989)

[2]

Ben-Ari E., On acknowledgements in ethnographies, Journal of Anthropological Research, 43, 1, pp. 63-84, (1987)

[3]

Berger J., Wagner D.G., Zelditch M., Theory growth, social processes, and metatheory, Theory Building in Sociology: Assessing Theoretical Cumulation, pp. 19-42, (1989)

[4]

Bourdieu P., Homo Academicus, (1990)

[5]

Bourdieu P., Language & Symbolic Power, (1991)

[6]

Brodkey L., Academic Writing as Social Practice, (1987)

[7]

Chubin D.E., Trusted assessorship in science: A relation in need of data, Social Studies of Science, 5, pp. 362-368, (1975)

[8]

Cronin B., The need for a theory of citing, Journal of Documentation, 37, 1, pp. 16-24, (1981)

[9]

Cronin B., The Citation Process: The Role and Significance of Citations in Scientific Communication, (1984)

[10]

Cronin B., Tiered citation and measures of document similarity, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45, 7, pp. 537-538, (1994)

← 1 2 3 4 5 →