Review of the management of recurrent inguinal hernia

被引:40
作者
Richards S.K. [1 ]
Vipond M.N. [1 ]
Earnshaw J.J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Gloucestershire Royal Hospital, GL1 3NN Gloucester, Great Western Road
关键词
Complications; Hernia; Hernia mesh; Recurrence;
D O I
10.1007/s10029-003-0194-1
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: There is little available evidence on the optimal management of recurrent inguinal hernia, particularly if the original procedure involved the use of mesh. This study was a review of recurrent hernia repair in a district hospital, involving both laparoscopic and open procedures. Methods: The case notes of all patients who had a repair of a recurrent hernia between 1991 and 2000, inclusive, were examined; 171 procedures were included. Where known, the original repair was a nylon darn in 31%, mesh repair in 18%, and laparoscopic repair in 8%. Results: The recurrent hernia was repaired using a Lichtenstein open mesh technique in 63% and by the totally extraperitoneal (TEP) method in 22%. Complication rates were highest after emergency surgery (all had open surgery), where 71% had complications and one patient died. For elective repairs, complication rates were similar after open (13%) and TEP (8%) repairs. The duration of hospital stay was also similar (1.2 vs 1.3 days, respectively), and a single recurrence was seen in each group. Patients with recurrence after primary mesh repair were also managed by both techniques with similar results. Open re-operation for mesh failure was technically straightforward. Conclusions: Most recurrent hernias are still repaired by open techniques. There was no convincing evidence of different outcomes for open and TEP repairs in this review. Even when the original hernia repair involved the use of mesh, further open repair by an experienced surgeon is justified. © Springer-Verlag 2003.
引用
收藏
页码:144 / 148
页数:4
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
Laparoscopic compared with open methods of groin hernia repair: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials, Br. J. Surg., 87, pp. 860-867, (2000)
[2]  
Repair of groin hernia with synthetic mesh. Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials, Ann. Surg., 235, pp. 322-332, (2002)
[3]  
Open mesh vs non-mesh repair of groin hernia meta-analysis of randomized trials based on individual patient data, Hernia, 6, pp. 130-136, (2002)
[4]  
Laparoscopic vs open groin hernia repair: Meta-analysis of randomised trials based on individual patient data, Hernia, 6, pp. 2-10, (2002)
[5]  
Systematic review of the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of laparoscopic vs open repair of inguinal hernia, (2000)
[6]  
Kark A.E., Kurzer M., Waters K.J., Guidance on the use of laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia, (2001)
[7]  
Richards S.K., Earnshaw J.J., Management of primary and recurrent inguinal hernia by surgeons from the South West of England, Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl., 85, pp. 402-404, (2003)
[8]  
Barrat C., Surlin V., Bordea A., Champault G., Management of recurrent inguinal hernias: A prospective study of 163 cases, Hernia, 7, pp. 125-129, (2003)
[9]  
Motson R.W., Why does NICE not recommend laparoscopic herniorraphy?, BMJ, 324, pp. 1092-1094, (2002)
[10]  
Bay-Nielsen M., Nordin P., Nilsson E., Kehlet H., Operative findings in recurrent hernia after a Lichtenstein procedure, Am. J. Surg., 182, pp. 134-136, (2001)