Therapy for childhood acute myeloid leukemia: role of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation.

被引:4
作者
Abella E. [1 ]
Ravindranath Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Children's Hospital of Michigan, Wayne State University, 3901 Beaubien Boulevard, Detroit, 48201, MI
关键词
Acute Myeloid Leukemia; Down Syndrome; Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation; Match Unrelated Donor; Pediatric Oncology Group;
D O I
10.1007/s11912-000-0107-8
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has one of the lowest survival rates of childhood cancers. The first significant improvement in AML therapy started with the introduction of the now standard regimen of 3 days of anthracyclines and 7 days of cytarabine (Ara-C), the so-called 3+7 combinations. Several different therapeutic approaches have been taken in attempts to improve the outcome, including intensification of therapy both for remission induction and in the postremission phase. Intensification of postremission therapy included multiple courses of high-dose chemotherapy and/or myeloablative therapy followed by stem- cell rescue from either allogeneic or autologous sources. Furthermore, risk-tailored therapy is now possible, by cytogenetic risk stratification, promptness of remission induction, and identification of distinct clinical subgroups such as children with Down syndrome. This approach is rapidly changing potential therapeutic strategies for children with AML. It is in this changing mileu that we address the proper role of stem-cell transplantation, a modality that is changing (like chemotherapy) with expanding stem-cell sources and approaches to decrease transplant-related toxicity.
引用
收藏
页码:529 / 538
页数:9
相关论文
共 146 条
[1]  
Novakovic B(1994)U.S. childhood cancer survival, 1973–1987 Med Pediatr Oncol 23 480-486
[2]  
Weinstein HJ(1980)Treatment of acute myelogenous leukemia in children and adults N Engl J Med 303 473-478
[3]  
Mayer RJ(1996)Autologous bone marrow transplantation versus intensive consolidation chemotherapy for ccute myeloid leukemia in childhood N Engl J Med 334 1428-1434
[4]  
Rosenthal DS(1996)Timed-sequential induction therapy improves postremission outcome in acute myeloid leukemia: a report from the Children’s Cancer Group Blood 87 4979-4989
[5]  
Ravindranath Y(1995)Clinical significance of surface antigen expression in children with acute myeloid leukemia: results of study AML-BFM-87 Blood 86 3097-3108
[6]  
Yeager AM(1998)Randomised comparison of addition of autologous bone-marrow transplantation to intensive chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukaemia in first remission: results of MRC AML 10 trial. UK Medical Research Council Adult and Children’s Leukaemia Working Parties Lancet 351 700-708
[7]  
Chang MN(1996)A populationbased study of 272 children with acute myeloid leukaemia treated on two consecutive protocols with different intensity: best outcome in girls, infants, and children with Down’s syndrome. Nordic Society of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology (NOPHO) Br J Haematol 94 82-88
[8]  
Woods WG(1999)Acute myeloid leukemia N Engl J Med 341 1051-1062
[9]  
Kobrinsky N(1992)Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in Down’s syndrome is highly responsive to chemotherapy: experience on Pediatric Oncology Group AML Study 8498 Blood 80 2210-2214
[10]  
Buckley JD(1995)All-trans-retinoic acid as a differentiating agent in the treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia Blood 85 2643-2653