A competitive analysis of Chinese container ports using the analytic hierarchy process

被引:65
作者
Song D.-W. [1 ]
Yeo K.-T. [2 ]
机构
[1] Centre of Urban Planning and Environmental Management, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road
[2] Department of Distribution and Trade, Woosuk University, Chonbuk
关键词
Analytic hierarchy process; China; Competitiveness; Container port;
D O I
10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100096
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Over 20% of the world’s container traffic occurs from Asian ports. China’s entry into the market has significantly stimulated this process. Since China adopted its liberalised economic policy in the 1970s, its economy has grown at an average rate of 10% or more per annum. In particular, the efforts and investments that have been poured into its container ports are conspicuous, since approximately 90% of the country’s international trade (in volume terms) is handled through maritime transport. Chinese ports (especially container ports), however, have a number of problems, such as bureaucratic administration, insufficient facilities, the lack of service and commercial orientation and inefficient operations. This paper aims to identify the competitiveness of container ports in China including Hong Kong from the outsiders’ perspective, using the framework of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, and to provide managerial and strategic implications. As expected, the findings reveal that, in terms of competitiveness, Hong Kong, Shanghai and Yantian rank first, second and third, respectively. © 2004 Palgrave Macmillan Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 52
页数:18
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Badri M., Combining the analytic hierarchy process and goal programming for global facility location-allocation problem, International Journal of Production Economics, 62, pp. 237-248, (1999)
[2]  
Beynon M., An analysis of distributions of priority values from alternative comparison scales within AHP, European Journal of Operational Research, 140, pp. 104-117, (2002)
[3]  
Brooks M., Sea Change in Liner Shipping: Regulation and Managerial Decision-Making in a Global Industry, (2000)
[4]  
Chwolka A., Raith M., Group preference aggregation with the AHP: Implications for multiple-issue agendas, European Journal of Operational Research, 132, pp. 176-186, (2001)
[5]  
(2002)
[6]  
Cullinane K., Cullinane S., Wang T., Container terminal development in mainland China and its impact on the competitiveness of the port of Hong Kong, Transport Reviews, (2003)
[7]  
Cullinane K., Song D.-W., The administrative and ownership structure of Asian container ports, International Journal of Maritime Economics, 3, pp. 175-197, (2001)
[8]  
Intra-Asia Container Trades: Dynamism beyond Bounds, (2002)
[9]  
Foster T., What’s important in a port, Distribution Worldwide, 78, (1979)
[10]  
Frankel E., Port Planning and Development, (1987)