Adaptive Comanagement for Building Resilience in Social–Ecological Systems

被引:21
作者
Per Olsson
Carl Folke
Fikret Berkes
机构
[1] Stockholm University,Department of Systems Ecology and Centre for Transdisciplinary Environmental Research
[2] Natural Resources Institute University of Manitoba Winnipeg,undefined
来源
Environmental Management | 2004年 / 34卷
关键词
Adaptive management; Comanagement; Social–ecological systems; Resilience; Self-organization;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Ecosystems are complex adaptive systems that require flexible governance with the ability to respond to environmental feedback. We present, through examples from Sweden and Canada, the development of adaptive comanagement systems, showing how local groups self-organize, learn, and actively adapt to and shape change with social networks that connect institutions and organizations across levels and scales and that facilitate information flows. The development took place through a sequence of responses to environmental events that widened the scope of local management from a particular issue or resource to a broad set of issues related to ecosystem processes across scales and from individual actors, to group of actors to multiple-actor processes. The results suggest that the institutional and organizational landscapes should be approached as carefully as the ecological in order to clarify features that contribute to the resilience of social–ecological systems. These include the following: vision, leadership, and trust; enabling legislation that creates social space for ecosystem management; funds for responding to environmental change and for remedial action; capacity for monitoring and responding to environmental feedback; information flow through social networks; the combination of various sources of information and knowledge; and sense-making and arenas of collaborative learning for ecosystem management. We propose that the self-organizing process of adaptive comanagement development, facilitated by rules and incentives of higher levels, has the potential to expand desirable stability domains of a region and make social–ecological systems more robust to change.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 90
页数:15
相关论文
共 151 条
[1]  
Barrett C. B.(2001)Conserving tropical biodiversity amid weak institutions BioScience 51 497-502
[2]  
Brandon K.(1979)An investigation of Cree Indian domestic fisheries in northern Quebec Arctic 32 46-70
[3]  
Gibson C.(1981)Some environmental and social impacts of the James Bay hydroelectric project, Canada Journal of Environmental Management 12 157-172
[4]  
Gjertsen H.(1982)Preliminary impacts of the James Bay hydroelectric project, Quebec, on estuarine fish and fisheries Arctic 35 524-530
[5]  
Berkes F.(1988)The intrinsic difficulty of predicting impacts: lessons from the James Bay hydro project Environmental Impact Assessment Review 8 201-220
[6]  
Berkes F.(2001)Adapting to climate change: social–ecological resilience in a Canadian western Arctic community Conservation Ecology 5 18-1262
[7]  
Berkes F.(2000)Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management Ecological Applications 10 1251-237
[8]  
Berkes F.(1997)Knowledge in action: Local knowledge as a development resource and barriers to its incorporation in natural resource research and development Agricultural Systems 55 217-457
[9]  
Berkes F.(2001)Coping with collapse: ecological and social dynamics in ecosystem management Bioscience 6 451-781
[10]  
Jolly D.(2001)From metaphor to measurement: Resilience of what to what Ecosystems 4 765-557