Technical aspects of multifocal ERG recording

被引:36
作者
David Keating
Stuart Parks
Aled Evans
机构
[1] Gartnavel General Hospital,ElectroDiagnostic Imaging Unit, Tennent Institute of Ophthalmology
[2] Southern General Hospital,Department of Clinical Physics & Bio
关键词
multifocal analysis; multifocal ERG; stimulus delivery;
D O I
10.1023/A:1002723501303
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
There are a wide range of variables which can influence the quality of the multifocal response. It is possible to place these variables into one of four categories. First, the method of stimulus delivery will determine the field of view, interference levels and the duration of on-state stimulation. Second, data acquisition variables such as electrode type and placement, amplifier specifications and filter bandwidth settings will have a direct impact on waveform shape and on the topographic distribution of signal amplitudes. Third, patient variables such as fixation, pupil dilation and refractive error will also contribute to the multifocal response. Fourth, there are many measurements that can be taken from multifocal recordings. In addition to standard amplitude and implicit time measures (the implicit time measure in the multifocal response is becoming increasingly important particularly in early stages of disease processes), the scalar product measure provides information on waveform shape. The conventional impulse and higher order responses will be different for different modes of stimulation such as Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) and Liquid Crystal Display (LCD) systems and latency shifts will be introduced if not corrected in software. Procedures which could lead to misleading interpretation include artefact rejection, averaging with neighbours and summing of responses. These procedures should be handled with caution.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 98
页数:21
相关论文
共 94 条
[1]  
Sutter EE(1992)The field topography of ERG components in man-I. The photopic luminance response Vision Res 32 433-46
[2]  
Tran D.(1999)Wide field functional imaging of the retina Brit J Op Phot 2 2-5
[3]  
Parks S(1993)A comparison of flash electroretinograms recorded from Burian Allen, JET, C-glide, gold foil, DTL and skin electrodes Eye 7 169-71
[4]  
Keating D(1997)Comparisons of contact lens, foil, fiber and skin electrodes for pattern electroretinograms Doc Ophthalmol 94 327-40
[5]  
Hammer HM(1997)The repeatability and variability of the multifocal electroretinogram for four different electrode types Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 17 530-35
[6]  
Evans AL.(1999)A three dimensional model of the human eye: the optimisation of electroretinographic signal detection Med Biol Eng Comp 37 710-719
[7]  
Esakowitz L(1992)Packing geometry of human cone photoreceptors: variation with eccentricity and evidence for local anisotropy Vis Neurosci 9 169-80
[8]  
Kriss A(1991)Distribution and morphology of human cone photoreceptors stained with anti-blue opsin J Comp Neurol 312 610-24
[9]  
Shawkat F.(1997)The effect of filter bandwidth on the multifocal electroretinogram Doc.Ophthalmol 92 291-300
[10]  
McCulloch DL(1998)Implicit time topography of multifocal electroretinograms Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 39 718-23