Some economic consequences of noncompliance

被引:19
作者
Urquhart J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Palo Alto, CA 94301
关键词
Electronic Monitoring; Pill Count; Prescribe Regimen; Coronary Drug Project; Variable Compliance;
D O I
10.1007/s11906-001-0009-7
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The twin problems of poor compliance and poor persistence with prescribed antihypertensive drug regimens appear to be responsible for much of the huge shortfall in the proportion of hypertensives whose treatment brings their blood pressure down to satisfactory levels. A further problem is the confounding of nonresponse and poor compliance in patients with "drug-resistant hypertension," in that about half of such patients are poor compliers, whose response to simple regimens usually proves satisfactory once their compliance with prescribed regimens is corrected. Electronic means for compiling ambulatory patients' drug dosing histories have now made it both technically and economically feasible to distinguish clearly between non-compliers and nonresponders, which clinical judgment cannot do because it is no better at making this crucial distinction than a coin toss. With the advent of reliable, economical measurements of patient compliance with prescribed drug dosing regimens, we can probably eliminate most of t he compl i a nce probl ems. The probl em awai ti ng us after that is poor persistence with prescribed regimens for antihypertensive and other cardiovascular medicines that are meant for long-term or life-long use. A recent study has shown that median persistence with fully reimbursed drugs of the statin class is only 6 months, which is about one fortieth of the length it should be to realize full benefits of such therapy. Copyright © 2001 by Current Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:473 / 480
页数:7
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
Katz R., Regulatory view: Use of subgroup data for determination of efficacy, Compliance in Medical Practice and Clinical Trials, pp. 251-264, (1991)
[2]  
Cramer J.A., Mattson R.H., Prevey M.L., Et al., How often is medication taken as prescribed? A novel assessment technique, JAMA, 261, pp. 3273-3277, (1989)
[3]  
Kruse W., Weber E., Dynamics of drug regimen compliance - Its assessment by microprocessor-based monitoring, Eur J Clin Pharmacol, 38, pp. 561-565, (1990)
[4]  
Cramer J.A., Microelectronic systems for monitoring and enhancing patient compliance with medication regimens, Drugs, 49, pp. 321-327, (1995)
[5]  
Kastrissios H., Blaschke T.F., Medication compliance as a feature in drug development, Ann Rev Pharmacol Toxicol, 37, pp. 451-475, (1997)
[6]  
Urquhart J., The electronic medication event monitor - Lessons for pharmacotherapy, Clin Pharmacokinet, 32, pp. 345-356, (1997)
[7]  
Vrijens B., Goetghebeur E., Comparing compliance patterns between randomized treatments, Control Clin Trial, 18, pp. 187-203, (1997)
[8]  
Urquhart J., De Klerk E., Contending paradigms for the interpretation of data on patient compliance with therapeutic drug regimens, Stat Med, 17, pp. 251-267, (1998)
[9]  
Rubio A., Cox C., Weintraub M., Prediction of diltiazem plasma concentration curves from limited measurements using compliance data, Clin Pharmacokinet, 22, pp. 238-246, (1992)
[10]  
Girard P., Sheiner L.B., Kastrissios H., Blaschke T.F., Do we need full compliance data for population pharmacokinetic analysis?, J Pharmacokinet Biopharm, 24, pp. 265-282, (1996)