Finger extensor variability in TMS parameters among chronic stroke patients

被引:44
作者
Butler A.J. [1 ,4 ]
Kahn S.
Wolf S.L. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Weiss P. [5 ]
机构
[1] Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta
[2] Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta
[3] Department of Cell Biology, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta
[4] Department of Psychology, Emory College, Emory University, Atlanta
[5] Department of Biostatistics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta
关键词
motor mapping; reliability; center of gravity; upper limb; plasticity; rehabilitation; cortex;
D O I
10.1186/1743-0003-2-10
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: This study determined the reliability of topographic motor cortical maps and MEP characteristics in the extensor digitorum communis (EDC) evoked by single-pulse TMS among patients with chronic stroke. Methods: Each of ten patients was studied on three occasions. Measures included location of the EDC hotspot and center of gravity (COG), threshold of activation and average amplitude of the hotspot, number of active sites, map volume, and recruitment curve (RC) slope. Results: Consistent intrahemispheric measurements were obtained for the three TMS mapping sessions for all measured variables. No statistically significant difference was observed between hemispheres for the number of active sites, COG distance or the RC slope. The magnitude and range of COG movement between sessions were similar to those reported previously with this muscle in able-bodied individuals. The average COG movement over three sessions in both hemispheres was 0.90 cm. The average COG movement in the affected hemisphere was 1.13 (± 0.08) cm, and 0.68 (± 0.04) cm) for the less affected hemisphere. However, significant interhemispheric variability was seen for the average MEP amplitude, normalized map volume, and resting motor threshold. Conclusion: The physiologic variability in some TMS measurements of EDC suggest that interpretation of TMS mapping data derived from hemiparetic patients in the chronic stage following stroke should be undertaken cautiously. Irrespective of the muscle, potential causes of variability should be resolved to accurately assess the impact of pharmacological or physical interventions on cortical organization as measured by TMS among patients with stroke. © 2005 Butler et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]
Barker A.T., The history and basic principles of magnetic nerve stimulation, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Volume 51, 51, pp. 3-18, (1999)
[2]
Beric A., Transcranial electrical and magnetic stimulation, Electrical and Magnetic Stimulation of the Brain and Spinal Cord. Advances in Neurology Volume 63, 63, pp. 29-42, (1993)
[3]
Wassermann E.M., Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: Report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, June 5-7, 1996, Electroencephalogr & Clin Neurophysiol, 108, pp. 1-16, (1998)
[4]
Pascual-Leone A., Tormos J.M., Keenan J., Tarazona F., Canete C., Catala M.D., Study and modulation of human cortical excitability with transcranial magnetic stimulation, J Clin Neurophysiol, 15, pp. 333-343, (1998)
[5]
Wolf S.L., Butler A.J., Campana G.I., Parris T.A., Struys D.M., Weinstein S.R., Weiss P., Intra-subject reliability of parameters contributing to maps generated by transcranial magnetic stimulation in able-bodied adults, Clin Neurophysiol, 115, pp. 1740-1747, (2004)
[6]
Mortifee P., Stewart H., Schulzer M., Eisen A., Reliability of transcranial magnetic stimulation for mapping the human motor cortex, Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 93, pp. 131-137, (1994)
[7]
Liepert J., Graef S., Uhde I., Leidner O., Weiller C., Training-induced changes of motor cortex representations in stroke patients, Acta Neurol Scand, 101, pp. 321-326, (2000)
[8]
Wolf S.L., Binder-MacLeod S.A., Electromyographic biofeedback applications to the hemiplegic patient. Changes in upper extremity neuromuscular and functional status, Phys Ther, 63, pp. 1393-1403, (1983)
[9]
Winstein C.J., Miller J.P., Blanton S., Taub E., Uswatte G., Morris D., Nichols D., Wolf S., Methods for a multisite randomized trial to investigate the effect of constraint-induced movement therapy in improving upper extremity function among adults recovering from a cerebrovascular stroke, Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 17, pp. 137-152, (2003)
[10]
Wassermann E.M., Variation in the response to transcranial magnetic brain stimulation in the general population, Clin Neurophysiol, 113, pp. 1165-1171, (2002)