Nonrandom segregation during meiosis: The unfairness of females

被引:170
作者
Pardo-Manuel De Villena F. [1 ]
Sapienza C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Genetics, Univ. of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill
[2] Fels Inst. for Cancer Res. and M., Dept. of Pathol. and Lab. Medicine, Temple Univ. School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19140
关键词
Chromosome Segregation; Meiotic Division; Spindle Pole; Common Perception; Segregation Distorter;
D O I
10.1007/s003350040003
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Most geneticists assume that chromosome segregation during meiosis is Mendelian (i.e., each allele at each locus is represented equally in the gametes). The great majority of reports that discuss non-Mendelian transmission have focused on systems of gametic selection, such as the mouse t-haplotype and Segregation distorter in Drosophila, or on systems in which post-fertilization selection takes place. Because the segregation of chromosomes in such systems is Mendelian and unequal representation of alleles among offspring is achieved through gamete dysfunction or embryonic death, there is a common perception that true disturbances in the randomness of chromosome segregation are rare and of limited biological significance. In this review we summarize data on nonrandom segregation in a wide variety of genetic systems. Despite apparent differences between some systems, the basic requirements for nonrandom segregation can be deduced from their shared characteristics: i) asymmetrical meiotic division(s); ii) functional asymmetry of the meiotic spindle poles; and iii) functional heterozygosity at a locus that mediates attachment of a chromosome to the spindle. The frequency with which all three of these requirements are fulfilled in natural populations is unknown, but our analyses indicate that nonrandom segregation occurs with sufficient frequency during female meiosis, and in exceptional cases of male meiosis, that it has important biological, clinical, and evolutionary consequences.
引用
收藏
页码:331 / 339
页数:8
相关论文
共 86 条
  • [1] Agulnik S.I., Agulnik A.I., Ruvinsky A.O., Meiotic drive in female mice heterozygous for the HSR inserts on chromosome 1, Genet Res, 55, pp. 97-100, (1990)
  • [2] Agulnik S.I., Sabantsev I.D., Ruvinsky A.O., Effect of the sperm genotype on chromatid segregation in female mice heterozygous for aberrant chromosome 1, Genet Res, 61, pp. 97-100, (1993)
  • [3] Aranha I.P., Martin-DeLeon P.A., Segregation analysis of the mouse Rb(6.16) translocation in zygotes produced by heterozygous female carriers, Cytogenet Cell Genet, 66, pp. 51-53, (1994)
  • [4] Boue A., Boue J., Gropp A., Cytogenetics of pregnancy wastage, Adv Hum Genet, 14, pp. 1-57, (1985)
  • [5] Britton-Davidian J., Catalan J., Da Graca Ramalhinho M., Ganem G., Auffray J.C., Et al., Rapid chromosomal evolution in island mice, Nature, 403, (2000)
  • [6] Buckler E.S., Phelps-Durr T.L., Buckler C.S.K., Dawe R.K., Doeblet J.F., Meiotic drive of chromosomal knobs reshaped the maize genome, Genetics, 153, pp. 415-426, (1999)
  • [7] Cano M.I., Santos J.L., Cytological basis of the B chromosome accumulation mechanism in the grasshopper Heteracris littoralis (Ramb), Heredity, 62, pp. 91-95, (1989)
  • [8] Catcheside D.G., Polarized segregation in an Ascomycete, Ann Bot, 8, pp. 119-130, (1945)
  • [9] Cattanach B.M., XO mice, Genet Res, 3, pp. 487-490, (1962)
  • [10] Chakraborty R., Stivers D.N., Deka R., Yu L.M., Shriver M.D., Et al., Segregation distortion of CTG repeats at the myotonic dystrophy locus, Am J Hum Genet, 59, pp. 109-118, (1996)