The synergy factor: A statistic to measure interactions in complex diseases

被引:100
作者
Cortina-Borja M. [1 ]
Smith A.D. [2 ]
Combarros O. [3 ,4 ]
Lehmann D.J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Centre for Paediatric Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, WC1N 1EH
[2] Oxford Project to Investigate Memory and Ageing (OPTIMA), Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, Oxford, OX1 3QX, South Parks Road
[3] Neurology Service, Centro de Investigacián Biomédica en Red Sobre Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas, Sevilla
[4] Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, University of Cantabria
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Binary Interaction; Accessible Method; Susceptibility Factor; High Order Interaction; Bootstrap Approximation;
D O I
10.1186/1756-0500-2-105
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background. One challenge in understanding complex diseases lies in revealing the interactions between susceptibility factors, such as genetic polymorphisms and environmental exposures. There is thus a need to examine such interactions explicitly. A corollary is the need for an accessible method of measuring both the size and the significance of interactions, which can be used by non-statisticians and with summarised, e.g. published data. The lack of such a readily available method has contributed to confusion in the field. Findings. The synergy factor (SF) allows assessment of binary interactions in case-control studies. In this paper we describe its properties and its novel characteristics, e.g. in calculating the power to detect a synergistic effect and in its application to meta-analyses. We illustrate these functions with real examples in Alzheimer's disease, e.g. a meta-analysis of the potential interaction between a BACE1 polymorphism and APOE4: SF = 2.5, 95% confidence interval: 1.5-4.2; p = 0.0001. Conclusion. Synergy factors are easy to use and clear to interpret. Calculations may be performed through the Excel programmes provided within this article. Unlike logistic regression analysis, the method can be applied to datasets of any size, however small. It can be applied to primary or summarised data, e.g. published data. It can be used with any type of susceptibility factor, provided the data are dichotomised. Novel features include power estimation and meta-analysis. © 2009 Combarros et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Culverhouse R., Suarez B.K., Lin J., Reich T., A perspective on epistasis: Limits of models displaying no main effect, American Journal of Human Genetics, 70, 2, pp. 461-471, (2002)
[2]  
Moore J.H., Williams S.M., New strategies for identifying gene-gene interactions in hypertension, Ann Med, 34, pp. 88-95, (2002)
[3]  
Moore J.H., The ubiquitous nature of epistasis in determining susceptibility to common human diseases, Hum Hered, 56, pp. 73-82, (2003)
[4]  
Pembrey M., The Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC): A resource for genetic epidemiology. the ALSPAC Study Team, Eur J Endocrinol, 151, (2004)
[5]  
Fitzmaurice G., The meaning and interpretation of interaction, Nutrition, 16, pp. 313-314, (2000)
[6]  
Berrington De Gonzlez A., Cox D.R., Additive and multiplicative models for the joint effect of two risk factors, Biostatistics, 6, pp. 1-9, (2005)
[7]  
Berrington De Gonzlez A., Cox D.R., Interpretation of interaction: A review, Ann Appl Stat, 1, pp. 371-385, (2007)
[8]  
Rothman K.J., Greenland S., Modern Epidemiology, (1998)
[9]  
Rothman K.J., Synergy and antagonism in cause-effect relationships, Am J Epidemiol, 99, pp. 385-388, (1974)
[10]  
Rothman K.J., The estimation of synergy or antagonism, Am J Epidemiol, 103, pp. 506-511, (1976)