A study of abnormal cervical cytology in pregnant women

被引：6

作者：

Yamazaki T. ^{[1
]}

Inaba F. ^{[1
]}

Takeda N. ^{[1
]}

Huruno M. ^{[1
]}

Kamemori T. ^{[1
]}

Kousaka N. ^{[1
]}

Ohta Y. ^{[1
]}

Fukasawa I. ^{[1
]}

Inaba N. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dokkyo University, School of Medicine, Shimotsuga-gun, 321-0293 Tochigi, Mibu-machi

来源：

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | 2006年 / 273卷 / 5期

关键词：

Abnormal cytology; Conservative management; Diagnostic LEEP conization; Pregnant woman;

D O I：

10.1007/s00404-005-0032-z

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

During the 4 year routine study of smears in 2,919 pregnant women, 33 cases of abnormals of the uterine cervix were detected (1.13%). The patients were followed with uterine cervical cytology and colposcopy and in case of need, sometimes punch biopsies were performed. The results of the cytologies, 33 cases with abnormalities were detected. There were 26 cases classified as class IIIa, 7 cases were class IIIb. All the cases underwent colposcopy. For the 17 cases that showed lesions by colposcopy, and punch biopsies were performed. The results of histologic examination were wide variety, five chronic cervicitis, one condyloma, one mild dysplasia, three moderate dysplasia, three severe dysplasia, three carcinoma in situ, and one microinvasive carcinoma. Only two cases were treated during pregnancy; one with condyloma underwent Laser vaporization and another with microinvasive carcinoma underwent LEEP conization. Other cases were given conservative treatment during pregnancy. Excluding one case for persistence smear class IIIa of histology condyloma, all the cases showed regression of dysplasia and carcinoma in situ with treatment after delivery. We conclude that lesions up to carcinoma in situ do not require intervention during pregnancy but microinvasive carcinoma is suspected, diagnostic LEEP conization is necessary, even during pregnancy. © Springer-Verlag 2005.

引用

页码：274 / 277

页数：3

共 18 条

[1]

Bosch F.X., Manos M.M., Munoz N., Sherman M., Jansen A.M., Peto J., Shiffman M.H., Moreno V., Kurman R., Shah K.V., Prevalence of human papillomavirus in cervical cancer: A worldwide perspective, J Natl Cancer Inst, 87, pp. 796-802, (1995)

[2]

Boutselis J.G., Intraepithelial carcinoma of the cervix associated with pregnancy, Obstet Gynecol, 40, pp. 657-666, (1972)

[3]

Fife K.H., Katz B.P., Roush J., Handy V.D., Brown D.R., Hansell R., Cancer-associated human papillomavirus types are selectively increased in the cervix of women in the first trimester of pregnancy, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 174, pp. 1487-1493, (1996)

[4]

Baggish M.S., A comparison between laser excisional canization and laser vaporization for treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 155, pp. 39-44, (1986)

[5]

Demeter A., Sziller I., Csapo Z., Szantho A., Papp Z., Outcome of pregnancies after cold-knife conization of the uterine cervix during pregnancy, Eur J Gynaecol Oncol, 23, pp. 207-210, (2002)

[6]

El-Bastawissi A.Y., Becker T.M., Daling J.R., Effect of cervical carcinoma in situ and its management on pregnancy outcome, Obstet Gynecol, 93, pp. 207-212, (1999)

[7]

Van Rooijen M., Person E., Pregnancy outcome after laser vaporization of the cervix, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 78, pp. 346-348, (1999)

[8]

Avrette H.E., Nasser N., Yankow S.L., Little W.A., Cervical conization in pregnancy, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 15, pp. 543-549, (1970)

[9]

Jolles C.J., Gynecologic cancer associated with pregnancy, Semin Oncol, 16, pp. 417-424, (1989)

[10]

Hacker N.F., Berek J.S., Lagasse L.D., Charles E.H., Savage E.W., Moore J.G., Carcinoma of the cervix associated with pregnancy, Obstet Gynecol, 59, pp. 735-746, (1982)

← 1 2 →