Why Social Policy Needs Subjective Indicators

被引：11

作者：

Runt Veenhoven

机构：

[1] Erasmus University Rotterdam and University of Utrecht,

来源：

Social Indicators Research | 2002年 / 58卷

关键词：

Policy Maker; Social Policy; Subjective Measurement; Output Criterion; Final Output;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

There are many qualms about subjective indicators, and some believe that social policy would be better for not using them. This paper consists of a review of these objections. It is argued that policy makers need subjective indicators, the main reasons being:

引用

页码：33 / 46

页数：13

共 12 条

[1]

Boelhouwer J.(1999)Measuring wellbeing in the Netherlands Social Indicators Research 48 51-75

[2]

Stoop I.(1980)The poverty line: A pilot survey in Europe Review of Economics and Statistics 63 461-465

[3]

VanPraag B.M.(1996)Happy life expectancy: a comprehensive measure of quality-of-life in nations Social Indicators Research 39 1-58

[4]

Goedhart T.(1997)Progrès dans la compréhension du bonheur Revue Québécoise de psychologie 18 29-47

[5]

Kapteyn A.(1998)Vergelijken van geluk in landen Sociale Wetenschappen 41 58-84

[6]

Veenhoven R.(2000)The four qualities of life: ordering concepts and measures of the good life Journal of happiness studies 1 1-39

[7]

Veenhoven R.(2000)Wellbeing in the welfare state: level not higher, distribu-tion not more equitable Journal of comparative policy analysis 2 91-125

[8]

Veenhoven R.(1995)Livability of the welfare state, length of life and appreciation of life in nations varying in state welfare effort Social Indicators Research 36 1-48

[9]

Veenhoven R.(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined

[10]

Veenhoven R.(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined

← 1 2 →