Traumatic Brain Injury Alters Word Memory Test Performance by Slowing Response Time and Increasing Cortical Activation: An fMRI Study of a Symptom Validity Test

被引:10
作者
Allen M.D. [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Wu T.C. [1 ,2 ]
Bigler E.D. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Department of Psychology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602
[2] Neuroscience Center, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT
[3] The Brain Institute of Utah, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
[4] Department of Psychiatry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
[5] Functional Imaging Unit, Riverwoods Imaging Center, Provo, UT
关键词
Effort testing; fMRI; Neuropsychological assessment; Symptom validity testing; Word Memory Test;
D O I
10.1007/s12207-011-9105-4
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Word Memory Test (WMT) is an established symptom validity test that relies on verbal memory performance to make inferences about "effort." Previous studies, using a functional MRI (fMRI) adaptation of the WMT with healthy controls, have shown that successful completion of the WMT relies on a widespread network of neural systems associated with high cognitive effort. Additional studies using the same fMRI paradigm with patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) suggest that increased activation of cortical regions associated with cognitive load are recruited to meet the cognitive challenges that the WMT places on a compromised neural system. This study builds on previous findings as a result of highly uncommon circumstances in which fMRI data on the WMT task were made available from the very same individual both 1 year before and 1 year after sustaining a TBI. Interestingly, the effect of TBI did not appear to impair performance on the WMT in terms of standard accuracy measurements, though response times were notably slower. The main fMRI finding was a significantly stronger and more widespread pattern of activation post-injury, particularly in the frontal and parietal brain regions, suggesting that stronger engagement of these networks was necessary to sustain accurate WMT performance compared to pre-injury testing. This unique source of data, together with previous findings, suggests a more complex relationship between effort and performance levels on the WMT than what is commonly assumed. © 2011 Springer Science + Business Media, LLC.
引用
收藏
页码:140 / 146
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]
Allen M.D., Fong A.K., Clinical application of standardized cognitive assessment using fMRI. I. Matrix reasoning, Behavioural Neurology, 20, pp. 127-140, (2008)
[2]
Allen M.D., Bigler E., Larsen J., Goodrich-Hunsaker N., Hopkins R., Functional neuroimaging evidence for high cognitive effort on the Word Memory Test in the absence of external incentives, Brain Injury, 21, pp. 1425-1428, (2007)
[3]
Braver T.S., Cohen J.D., Nystrom L.E., Jonides J., Smith E.E., Noll D.C., A parametric study of prefrontal cortex involvement in human working memory, NeuroImage, 5, pp. 49-62, (1997)
[4]
Crawford J.R., Howell D.C., Comparing an individual's test score against norms derived from small samples, Clinical Neuropsychology, 12, pp. 482-486, (1998)
[5]
Flaro L., Green P., Robertson E., Word Memory Test failure 23 times higher in mild brain injury than in parents seeking custody: The power of external incentives, Brain Injury, 21, pp. 373-383, (2007)
[6]
Gorissen M., Sanz J.C., Schmand B., Effort and cognition in schizophrenia patients, Schizophrenia Research, 78, pp. 199-208, (2005)
[7]
Green P., Manual for the Word Memory Test for Windows, (2003)
[8]
Hillary F.G., Genova H.M., Chiaravalloti N.D., Rypma B., Deluca J., Prefrontal modulation of working memory performance in brain injury and disease, Human Brain Mapping, 27, pp. 837-847, (2006)
[9]
Larsen J., Allen M., Bigler E., Goodrich-Hunsaker N., Hopkins R., Different patterns of cerebral activation in genuine and malingered cognitive effort during performance on the word memory test, Brain Injury, 24, pp. 89-99, (2010)
[10]
Levine B., Kovacevic N., Nica E., Cheung G., Gao F., Schwartz M.L., Black S.E., Et al., The Toronto traumatic brain injury study: Injury severity and quantified MRI, Neurology, 70, pp. 771-778, (2008)