学术探索
学术期刊
学术作者
新闻热点
数据分析
智能评审

The benefits and limitations of animal models for translational research in cartilage repair

被引：81
作者：
Moran C.J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ramesh A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Brama P.A.J. [4 ]
O’Byrne J.M. [1 ,5 ]
O’Brien F.J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Levingstone T.J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构：
[1] Tissue Engineering Research Group, Department of Anatomy, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St. Stephen’s Green
[2] Trinity Centre for Bioengineering, Trinity College Dublin
[3] Advanced Materials and Bioengineering Research (AMBER) Centre, RCSI & TCD, Dublin
[4] Section of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin
[5] Cappagh National Orthopaedic Hospital, Finglas
来源：
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics | / 3卷 / 1期
基金：
爱尔兰科学基金会;
关键词：
Cartilage; Collagen; In vivo; Osteochondral; Tissue engineering;
D O I：
10.1186/s40634-015-0037-x
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Much research is currently ongoing into new therapies for cartilage defect repair with new biomaterials frequently appearing which purport to have significant regenerative capacity. These biomaterials may be classified as medical devices, and as such must undergo rigorous testing before they are implanted in humans. A large part of this testing involves in vitro trials and biomechanical testing. However, in order to bridge the gap between the lab and the clinic, in vivo preclinical trials are required, and usually demanded by regulatory approval bodies. This review examines the in vivo models in current use for cartilage defect repair testing and the relevance of each in the context of generated results and applicability to bringing the device to clinical practice. Some of the preclinical models currently used include murine, leporine, ovine, caprine, porcine, canine, and equine models. Each of these has advantages and disadvantages in terms of animal husbandry, cartilage thickness, joint biomechanics and ethical and licencing issues. This review will examine the strengths and weaknesses of the various animal models currently in use in preclinical studies of cartilage repair. © 2016, Moran et al.
引用
收藏
页码：1 / 12
页数：11
相关论文
共 99 条
[1]
Ahern B.J., Parvizi J., Boston R., Schaer T.P., Preclinical animal models in single site cartilage defect testing: a systematic review, Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 17, 6, pp. 705-713, (2009)
[2]
Allen M.J., Houlton J.E., Adams S.B., Rushton N., The surgical anatomy of the stifle joint in sheep, Vet Surg, 27, 6, pp. 596-605, (1998)
[3]
Almeida H.V., Cunniffe G.M., Vinardell T., Buckley C.T., O'Brien F.J., Kelly D.J., Coupling Freshly Isolated CD44 Infrapatellar Fat Pad-Derived Stromal Cells with a TGF-beta3 Eluting Cartilage ECM-Derived Scaffold as a Single-Stage Strategy for Promoting Chondrogenesis, Adv Healthc Mater, 4, 7, pp. 1043-1053, (2015)
[4]
An Y.H., Freidman R.J., Animal Models in Orthopaedic Research, (1999)
[5]
Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act, 14, (1986)
[6]
Assche D.V., Caspel D.V., Staes F., Saris D.B., Bellemans J., Vanlauwe J., Et al., Implementing one standardized rehabilitation protocol following autologous chondrocyte implantation or microfracture in the knee results in comparable physical therapy management, Physiother Theory Pract, 27, 2, pp. 125-136, (2011)
[7]
Standard Guide for in vivo Assessment of Implantable Devices Intended to Repair or Regenerate Articular Cartilage, (2010)
[8]
Boopalan P.R., Arumugam S., Livingston A., Mohanty M., Chittaranjan S., Pulsed electromagnetic field therapy results in healing of full thickness articular cartilage defect, Int Orthop, 35, 1, pp. 143-148, (2011)
[9]
Brehm W., Aklin B., Yamashita T., Rieser F., Trub T., Jakob R.P., Et al., Repair of superficial osteochondral defects with an autologous scaffold-free cartilage construct in a caprine model: implantation method and short-term results, Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 14, 12, pp. 1214-1226, (2006)
[10]
Breinan H.A., Martin S.D., Hsu H.P., Spector M., Healing of canine articular cartilage defects treated with microfracture, a type-II collagen matrix, or cultured autologous chondrocytes, J Orthop Res, 18, 5, pp. 781-789, (2000)
12345678910