Interpreting VASS dimensions and profiles for physics students

被引:3
作者
Halloun I. [1 ,2 ]
Hestenes D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Physics and Astronomy, Arizona State University, Tempe
[2] Zouk Mekael
关键词
Qualitative Analysis; Quantitative Analysis; Major Determinant; Student Response; Scientific Realist;
D O I
10.1023/A:1008645410992
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Student views about knowing and learning physics have been probed with the Views About Sciences Survey (VASS) along six conceptual dimensions, and classified into four distinct profiles: expert, high transitional, low transitional, and folk, As an aid to interpreting VASS results, this article provides a qualitative analysis of student responses to items within each of the six dimensions and a quantitative analysis of their relation to students' profiles. Students with an expert profile are chiefly scientific realists and critical learners. Students with a folk profile are primarily naive realists and passive learners. Students with transitional profiles hold mixtures of these views. Student profiles correlate significantly with physics achievement. Indeed, they may be major determinants of what students learn in physics courses. © 1998 Kluwer Academic Publishers.
引用
收藏
页码:553 / 577
页数:24
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Aikenhead G.S., High-school Graduates' Beliefs about Science-Technology-Society III. Characteristics and Limitations of Scientific Knowledge, Science Education, 71, 2, pp. 145-161, (1987)
[2]  
Science for All Americans. Project 2061, (1990)
[3]  
Benchmarks for Science Literacy. Project 2061, (1993)
[4]  
Overcoming Inertia: High School Physics in the 1990s, AIP, College Park, (1996)
[5]  
Arons A.B., Student Patterns of Thinking and Reasoning. Parts II & III, The Physics Teacher, 22, pp. 21-26, (1984)
[6]  
Arons A.B., Guiding Insight and Inquiry in the Introductory Physics Laboratory, The Physics Teacher, 31, pp. 278-282, (1993)
[7]  
Baker D.R., Piburn M., Process Skills Acquisition, Cognitive Growth, and Attitude Change of Ninth Grade Students in a Scientific Literacy Course, J. Res. Science Teaching, 28, S, pp. 423-436, (1991)
[8]  
Chi M.T.H., Feltovich P.J., Glaser R., Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices, Cognitive Science, 5, pp. 121-152, (1981)
[9]  
Cobern W.W., College Students' Conceptualizations of Nature: An Interpretive World View Analysis, J. Res. Science Teaching, 30, 8, pp. 935-951, (1993)
[10]  
Ebenezer J.V., Zoller U., The No Change in Junior Secondary Students Attitudes Toward Science in a Period of Curriculum Change: A Probe into the Case of British Columbia, School Science and Mathematics, 93, 2, pp. 96-103, (1993)