A cognitive model for examining teachers instructional practice in mathematics: A guide for facilitating teacher reflection

被引：10

作者：

Artzt A.F. ^{[1
]}

Armour-Thomas E. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Queens College of the City University of New York, Department of Secondary Education and Youth Services, Klapper Hall 323, Flushing, NY 11367

来源：

Educational Studies in Mathematics | 1999年 / 40卷 / 3期

关键词：

Mathematic Teaching; Exploratory Study; Structure Interview; Lesson Plan; Cognitive Model;

D O I：

10.1023/A:1003871918392

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

The purpose of this exploratory study was to develop a model to examine teachers' instructional practice in secondary school mathematics in relationship to their underlying cognitions. The instructional practice and cognitions of seven experienced and seven beginning teachers of secondary school mathematics were examined as a basis for the creation of the model. To examine instructional practice a Phase-Dimension Framework for the Examination of Mathematics Teaching was developed. Data were obtained through observations, lesson plans, videotapes and audiotapes of structured interviews during the course of one semester. The value of the model lies in its usefulness as a guide for enabling teachers to reflect on their instructional practice and underlying cognitions in a structured, comprehensive manner. © 1999 Kluwer Academic Publishers.

引用

页码：211 / 235

页数：24

共 55 条

[1]

Artzt A.F., A structure to enable preservice teachers of mathematics to reflect on their teaching, Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 2, pp. 143-166, (1999)

[2]

Artzt A.F., Armour-Thomas E., Development of a cognitive-metacognitive framework for protocol analysis of mathematical problem solving in small groups, Cognition and Instruction, 9, pp. 137-175, (1992)

[3]

Artzt A.F., Armour-Thomas E., Mathematics teaching as problem solving: A framework for studying teacher metacognition underlying instructional practice in mathematics, Instructional Science, 26, pp. 5-25, (1998)

[4]

Artzt A.F., Armour-Thomas E., Mathematics Teaching As Problem Solving: A Framework for Studying the Relationship between Instructional Practice and Teachers Cognitive and Metacognitive Thoughts and Behaviors, (1993)

[5]

Armour-Thomas E., Szczesiul E., A Review of the Knowledge Base of the Connecticut Competency Instrument, (1989)

[6]

Bartlett F.C., Remembering, (1932)

[7]

Connecticut Competency Instrument, (1989)

[8]

Behr M.J., Harel G., Post T., Lesh R., Rational numbers, ratio, and proportion, Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, pp. 296-333, (1992)

[9]

Borko H., Livingston C., Cognition and improvisation: Differences in mathematics instruction by expert and novice teachers, American Educational Research Journal, 26, 4, pp. 473-498, (1989)

[10]

Borko H., Putnam R., Leaming to teach, Handbook of Educational Psychology, pp. 673-708, (1996)

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 →