Factorial invariance in preventive intervention: Modeling the development of intelligence in low birth weight, preterm infants

被引:13
作者
Frank R. Lawrence
Clancy Blair
机构
[1] Methodology Center, Pennsylvania State University, PA
[2] Dept. of Hum. Devmt. and Fam. Studs., Pennsylvania State University, PA
[3] Methodology Center, Pennsylvania State University, S-163 Henderson Building, University Park
关键词
Early intervention; Intelligence; Longitudinal methods;
D O I
10.1023/A:1026068115471
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The paper addresses the issue of measurement invariance in the analysis of preventive intervention data. Procedures for testing the invariance of covariance matrices, measurement models, and structural growth models are illustrated using data from an early intervention program for low birth weight, preterm infants. Intelligence Quotient (IQ) measured at 5 time points was modeled using piecewise growth curve analysis. Change over time in children's cognitive development was modeled separately for the pre- and postintervention periods. The first period was during the intervention, which lasted from birth through age 3 years. The second was during the postintervention period, which included follow-up assessments at ages 5 and 8 years. The analytical approach is illustrated with findings indicating that the development of IQ was different for higher low birth weight (HLBW: 2001-2500 g) and lower low birth weight (LLBW: <2001 g) infants. Examination of the effects of covariates on the IQ trajectories associated with the two birth weight groups indicated differential effects on IQ depending on the period of development and birth weight. Neonatal health and maternal age were predictors of IQ change in the LLBW group whereas maternal education was related to change in the HLBW group. During the posttreatment period, only Hispanic ethnicity and treatment group status were related to change. Hispanic participants exhibited an accelerated trajectory between program end and age 8 years. Intervention recipients exhibited a flatter trajectory during the same time period whereas participants in the control group exhibited an accelerated development, essentially catching up with their counterparts in the treatment group. Results clearly illustrate the utility of invariance testing in modeling developmental trajectories in response to preventive intervention.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 261
页数:12
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Arbuckle J.L., Full information estimation in the presence of incomplete data, Advanced Structural Equation Modeling: Issues and Techniques, pp. 243-277, (1996)
[2]  
Baltes P.B., Nesselroade J.R., History and rationale of longitudinal research, Longitudinal Research in the Study of Behavior and Development, pp. 1-39, (1979)
[3]  
Brooks-Gunn J., McCarton C.M., Casey P.H., McCormick M.C., Bauer C.R., Bernbaum J.C., Tyson J., Swanson M., Bennett F.C., Scott D.T., Tonascia J., Meinert C.L., Early intervention in low-birth weight premature infants: Results through age 5 years from the infant health and development program, Journal of the American Medical Association, 272, pp. 1257-1263, (1994)
[4]  
Brown R.L., Efficacy of the indirect approach for estimating structural equation models with missing data: A comparison of five methods, Structural Equation Modeling, 1, pp. 287-316, (1994)
[5]  
Bryk A.S., Raudenbush S.W., Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods, (1992)
[6]  
Byrne B.M., Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming, (2001)
[7]  
Byrne B.M., Shavelson R.J., Adolescent self-concept: Testing the assumption of equivalent structure across gender, American Educational Research Journal, 24, pp. 365-385, (1987)
[8]  
Cliff N., Some cautions of causal modeling methods, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 18, pp. 115-126, (1983)
[9]  
Cunningham W.R., Issues in factorial invariance, Best Methods for the Analysis of Change: Recent Advances, Unanswered Questions, Future Directions, pp. 106-125, (1991)
[10]  
Curran P.J., Adolescent substance use, Multivariate Applications in Substance Use Research: New Methods for New Questions, pp. 1-42, (2000)