A semi-quantitative RT-PCR method to measure the in vivo effect of dietary conjugated linoleic acid on porcine muscle PPAR gene expression

被引:63
作者
W. J. Meadus
机构
[1] Meat Research Section, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lacombe Research Center, Lacombe, Alta. T4L 1W1
关键词
Gene expression; In vivo; Muscle; Pigs; PPAR; RT-PCR;
D O I
10.1251/bpo43
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) can activate (in vitro) the nuclear transcription factors known as the peroxisome proliferators activated receptors (PPAR). CLA was fed at 11 g CLA/kg of feed for 45d to castrated male pigs (barrows) to better understand long term effects of PPAR activation in vivo. The barrows fed CLA had lean muscle increased by 3.5% and overall fat reduced by 9.2% but intramuscular fat (IMF %) was increased by 14% (P < 0.05). To measure the effect of long term feeding of CLA on porcine muscle gene expression, a semi-quantitative RT-PCR method was developed using cDNA normalized against the housekeeping genes cyclophilin and β-actin. This method does not require radioactivity or expensive PCR instruments with real-time fluorescent detection. PPARγ and the PPAR responsive gene AFABP but not PPARα were significantly increased (P < 0.05) in the CLA fed pig's muscle. PPARα and PPARγ were also quantitatively tested for large differences in gene expression by western blot analysis but no significant difference was detected at this level. Although large differences in gene expression of the PPAR transcriptional factors could not be confirmed by western blotting techniques. The increased expression of AFABP gene, which is responsive to PPAR transcriptional factors, confirmed that dietary CLA can induce a detectable increase in basal PPAR transcriptional activity in the live animal.
引用
收藏
页码:20 / 28
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Dugan M.E.R., Aalhus J.L., Schaefer A.L., Kramer J.K.G., The effect of conjugated linoleic acid on fat to lean repartitioning and feed conversion in pigs, Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 77, pp. 723-725, (1997)
[2]  
Issemann I., Green S., Activation of a member of the steroid hormone receptor superfamily by peroxisome proliferators, Nature, 347, pp. 645-650, (1990)
[3]  
Forman B.M., Tontonoz P., Chen J., Brun R.P., Spiegelman B.M., Evans R.M., 15-deoxy-δ<sup>12,14</sup>-prostaglandin J<sub>2</sub> is a ligand for the adipocyte determination factor PPARγ, Cell, 83, pp. 803-812, (1995)
[4]  
Ortiz J.A., Mallolas J., Nicot C., Bofarull J., Rodriguez J.C., Hegardt F.G., Haro D., Marrero P.F., Isolation of pig mitochondrial 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA synthase gene promoter: Characterization of a peroxisome proliferator-responsive element, Biochemistry Journal, 337, pp. 329-335, (1999)
[5]  
Mukherjee R., Jow L., Croston G.E., Paterniti J.R., Identification, characterization, and tissue distribution of human peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) isoforms PPARγ2 verses PPARγ1 and activation with retinoid X receptor agonists and antagonists, Journal of Biological Chemistry, 272, pp. 8071-8076, (1997)
[6]  
Mandrup S., Lane M.D., Regulating adipogenesis, Journal of Biological Chemistry, 272, pp. 5367-5370, (1997)
[7]  
Braissant O., Wahli W., Differential expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor -α, -β, and -γ during rat embryonic development, Endocrinology, 139, pp. 2748-2754, (1998)
[8]  
Michalik L., Wahli W., Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors: Three isotypes for a multitude of functions, Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 10, pp. 564-570, (1999)
[9]  
Bustin S.A., Invited review: Quanitification of mRNA using real-time reverese transcription PCR (RT-PCR): Trends and problems, Journal of Molecular Endocrinology, 29, pp. 23-39, (2002)
[10]  
Stangl G.I., Muller H., Kirchgessner M., Conjugated linoleic acid effects on circulating hormones, metabolites and lipoproteins, and its proportion in fasting serum and erythrocyte membranes of swine, European Journal of Nutrition, 38, pp. 271-277, (1999)