The biogenic approach to cognition

被引:155
作者
Pamela Lyon
机构
[1] Australian National University/University of Adelaide,
关键词
Cognition; Theory; Explanation; Biology of cognition;
D O I
10.1007/s10339-005-0016-8
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
After half a century of cognitive revolution we remain far from agreement about what cognition is and what cognition does. It was once thought that these questions could wait until the data were in. Today there is a mountain of data, but no way of making sense of it. The time for tackling the fundamental issues has arrived. The biogenic approach to cognition is introduced not as a solution but as a means of approaching the issues. The traditional, and still predominant, methodological stance in cognitive inquiry is what I call the anthropogenic approach: assume human cognition as the paradigm and work ‘down’ to a more general explanatory concept. The biogenic approach, on the other hand, starts with the facts of biology as the basis for theorizing and works ‘up’ to the human case by asking psychological questions as if they were biological questions. Biogenic explanations of cognition are currently clustered around two main frameworks for understanding biology: self-organizing complex systems and autopoiesis. The paper describes the frameworks and infers from them ten empirical principles—the biogenic ‘family traits’—that constitute constraints on biogenic theorizing. Because the anthropogenic approach to cognition is not constrained empirically to the same degree, I argue that the biogenic approach is superior for approaching a general theory of cognition as a natural phenomenon.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 29
页数:18
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]  
Adler J(1974)’Decision’-making in bacteria: chemotactic response of Science 184 1292-2294
[2]  
Tso W-W(2004) to conflicting stimuli Biosystems 73 1-11
[3]  
Balazs A(1996)What does a molecule want? The myth of the self-replicating molecule (comments on the "selfish-gene" paradigm) Biosystems 38 235-541
[4]  
Barham J(1998)A dynamical model of the meaning of information Cogn Sci 22 295-517
[5]  
Bechtel W(1990)Representations and cognitive explanations: assessing the dynamicist’s challenge in cognitive science Synthese 82 223-353
[6]  
Bechtel W(1998)Beyond the exclusively propositional era J Exp Theor Artif Intell 10 179-915
[7]  
Abrahamsen A(2000)Levels of representationality Evol Anthropol: Issue News Rev 9 248-857
[8]  
Bickhard MH(2000)Human evolution and human history: a complete theory Cybernet Human Know 7 57-75
[9]  
Bingham PM(1991)Biosemiotics as a possible bridge between embodiment in cognitive semantics and the motivation concept of animal cognition in ethology Artif Intell 47 139-959
[10]  
Brier S(2004)Intelligence without representation Trends C Sc 8 341-146