Environmental interventions to enhance student adjustment: Implications for prevention

被引:22
作者
Joseph C. Berryhill
Ronald J. Prinz
机构
[1] University of North Carolina, Asheville
[2] University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC
[3] Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina, Columbia
关键词
Classroom; Environmental intervention; School; Student adjustment;
D O I
10.1023/A:1022994514767
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
School settings, often the sites for the prevention of adverse outcomes or the promotion of adjustment, are usually not the actual targets of such interventions. However, some interventions focus on modifying the school or classroom environments themselves. This review examines such approaches, and considers how school regularities that might undermine student adjustment are addressed. The environmental interventions are clustered in terms of focus: on student-student interactions, on teacher and peer influences, and on organizational function and structure. Reasons for the paucity of environmental change efforts and the inherent difficulties are discussed, and recommendations for creating ways to undertake future environmental interventions in schools are offered.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 87
页数:22
相关论文
共 186 条
  • [1] Abbott R.D., O'Donnell J., Hawkins J.D., Hill K.G., Kosterman R., Catalano R.F., Changing teaching practices to promote achievement and bonding to school, American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 68, pp. 542-552, (1998)
  • [2] Allen V.L., Children As Teachers: Theory and Research on Tutoring, (1976)
  • [3] Anderman E.M., Maehr M.L., Midgley C., Declining motivation after the transition to middle school: Schools can make a difference, Journal of Research and Development in Education, 32, pp. 131-147, (1999)
  • [4] Arhar J.M., Personalizing the social organization of middle-level schools: Does interdisciplinary teaming make a difference?, Changing American Education: Recapturing the Past or Inventing the Future?, pp. 325-350, (1994)
  • [5] Babad E., Pygmalion - 25 Years after interpersonal expectations in the classroom, Interpersonal Expectations: Theory, Research and Applications, pp. 125-153, (1993)
  • [6] Barrish H.H., Saunders M., Wolf M.M., Good Behavior Game: Effects of individual contingencies for group consequences on disruptive behavior in a classroom, Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2, pp. 119-124, (1969)
  • [7] Battistich V., Schaps E., Watson M., Solomon D., Prevention effects of the Child Development Project: Early findings from an ongoing multisite demonstration trial, Journal of Adolescent Research, 11, pp. 12-35, (1996)
  • [8] Battistich V., Schaps E., Watson M., Solomon D., Lewis C., Effects of the Child Development Project on students' drug use and other problem behaviors, Journal of Primary Prevention, 21, pp. 75-99, (2000)
  • [9] Battistich V., Solomon D., Kim D., Watson M., Schaps E., Schools as communities, poverty levels of student populations, and students' attitudes, motives and performance: A multilevel analysis, American Educational Research Journal, 32, pp. 627-658, (1995)
  • [10] Battistich V., Solomon D., Watson M., Schaps E., Caring school communities, Educational Psychologist, 32, pp. 137-151, (1997)