Predator-prey interactions between two amphibian species: Effects of insecticide exposure

被引:54
作者
Bridges C.M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Division of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia
[2] U.S.G.S, Columbia Environ. Research Center, Columbia, MO 65201
关键词
Carbaryl; Newt; Pesticide; Predation rates; Rana; Sublethal effects; Tadpole;
D O I
10.1023/A:1009922825444
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The presence of environmental contaminants may alter predator-prey interactions among aquatic species by altering activity levels of predators or prey, or by altering predator avoidance behavior. The outcome of a predatory encounter may be dependent upon whether both species are exposed to a contaminant simultaneously, or whether exposure occurs only in one of the species. In a laboratory experiment, I used the insecticide carbaryl to examine predation of southern leopard frog tadpoles (Rana sphenocephala) by adult red-spotted newts (Notophthalmus viridescens) under four conditions: both tadpoles and newts exposed, neither tadpoles nor newts exposed, and either newts or tadpoles only exposed. After one hour, exposed newts consumed half as many tadpoles as nonexposed newts. Carbaryl potentially affected newt activity enough to reduce time spent searching for prey, or may have altered the speed and coordination necessary to capture tadpoles. After six hours, non-exposed and exposed newts consumed similar numbers of tadpoles, most likely indicating recovery from exposure. After 24 h, predation rates were lowest when both newts and tadpoles were simultaneously either exposed or not exposed, and were greatest when newts and tadpoles were not exposed simultaneously. This study suggests that when tadpoles and newts are exposed to a sublethal level of a contaminant simultaneously, that predation rates do not differ from those observed under natural conditions, but exposure of either predator or prey at different times can disrupt predator-prey dynamics.
引用
收藏
页码:205 / 211
页数:6
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Baltz D.M., Moyle P.B., Knight N.J., Competitive interactions between benthic stream fishes, riffle sculpin, Cottus gulosus, and speckled dace, Rhinichthys osculus, Can J Fish Aquat Sci, 39, pp. 1502-1511, (1982)
[2]  
Barinaga M., Where have all the froggies gone?, Science, 247, pp. 1033-1034, (1990)
[3]  
Berrill M., Bertram S., Wilson A., Louis S., Brigham D., Stromberg C., Lethal and sublethal impacts of pyrethroid insecticides on amphibian embryos and tadpoles, Environ Toxicol Chem, 12, pp. 525-539, (1993)
[4]  
Blaustein A.R., Wake D.B., Declining amphibian populations: A global phenomenon?, Trends Ecol Evol, 5, pp. 203-204, (1990)
[5]  
Boone M.D., Bridges C.M., The effect of temperature on the potency of carbaryl for survival of tadpoles of the green frog (Rana clamitans), Environ Toxicol Chem, 18, pp. 1482-1484, (1999)
[6]  
Bridges C.M., Tadpole swimming performance and activity affected by acute exposure to sublethal levels of carbaryl, Environ Toxicol Chem, 16, pp. 1935-1939, (1997)
[7]  
Bridges C.M., Effects of a pesticide on tadpole activity and predator avoidance behavior, J Herpetol, 33, pp. 303-306, (1999)
[8]  
Cairns J. Jr., The myth of the most sensitive species, Bio-Science, 36, pp. 670-672, (1986)
[9]  
Cooke A.S., Selective predation by newts on frog tadpoles treated with DDT, Nature, 229, pp. 275-276, (1971)
[10]  
Clements W.H., Cherry D.S., Cairns J. Jr., The influence of copper exposure on predator-prey interactions in aquatic insect communities, Freshw Biol, 21, pp. 483-488, (1989)